Thanks!
On 10 abr, 15:13, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:53 AM,FlavioCoelho wrote:
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > So it seems that there is no (easy or otherwise) way to build from
> > latest development tree, only from the last "stable" source tarball.
>
> The latest development version
Hi Flavio,
On 10 Apr., 14:30, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2009, at 7:13 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Flavio Coelho
> > wrote:
...
> >> So it seems that there is no (easy or otherwise) way to build from
> >> latest development tree, only from the last
On Apr 10, 2009, at 7:13 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Flavio Coelho
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> So it seems that there is no (easy or otherwise) way to build from
>> latest development tree, only from the last "stable" source tarball.
>
> The latest development
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Flavio Coelho wrote:
>
> Thanks,
>
> So it seems that there is no (easy or otherwise) way to build from
> latest development tree, only from the last "stable" source tarball.
The latest development version is here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/r
Thanks,
So it seems that there is no (easy or otherwise) way to build from
latest development tree, only from the last "stable" source tarball.
That's what I was hoping for.
On 9 abr, 18:15, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Flavio Coelho wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi, I cloned Sa
On Apr 9, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Flavio Coelho wrote:
> Hi, I cloned Sage from the mercrial repository (hg.sagemath.org) but
> found no building instructions.
>
> I want to build it inplace. The install script complains that I must
> provide a sage root and if I give the current directory, '.', it spi
