On Dec 30, 4:45 am, Marshall Hampton wrote:
> It seems like this really depends how the files are generated and what
> needs to be done to them. If a scientific instrument is generating
> them, perhaps they could be put onto a web server, and then accessed
> with urllib functions? Do they ne
It seems like this really depends how the files are generated and what
needs to be done to them. If a scientific instrument is generating
them, perhaps they could be put onto a web server, and then accessed
with urllib functions?Do they need to be analyzed one by one, by a
person? If so, perh
Adam Webb wrote:
>
>
> Well I agree that I don't want just any web-app to have local access.
> So I will simply put it down as being a bad idea.
>
> Using a zip-file is still an option. I called it unfriendly as it
> means that the user will have to use another program to prepare the
> data fir
>
> How is it not user-friendly? (I'm really curious). Python has some
> very nice ways with dealing with zip files. Here is some pages from a
> google search on python and zip:
>
> http://docs.python.org/library/zipfile.html
>
> http://effbot.org/librarybook/zipfile.htm
>
> Is there a better
Adam Webb wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I often have multiple files for analysis. For example, I might have a
> few hundred spectra in a single directory as a single series. I want
> to run a script that loads them one at a time, does something on each,
> and returns a result in a final file. This works fi