On Friday, June 21, 2019 at 11:29:06 AM UTC+9, saad khalid wrote:
>
> I definitely see your point, it doesn't look fancy to me. But, I would
> argue that Mathematica *does* have very "fancy" and accessible looking
> documentation, and I think accessibility and polish are what new users may
> b
I definitely see your point, it doesn't look fancy to me. But, I would
argue that Mathematica *does* have very "fancy" and accessible looking
documentation, and I think accessibility and polish are what new users may
base their choice on when deciding which CAS to use.
On Thursday, June 20, 20
On Wednesday, June 19, 2019 at 9:31:05 PM UTC+9, saad khalid wrote:
>
> Hi all:
>
> The sage documentation hosted online (eg.
> http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/index.html ) looks very old. To
> me at least, it makes the software seem ancient, and I believe it puts off
> younger new u
On Mar 12, 10:18 am, kcrisman wrote:
> On Mar 12, 12:33 pm, kaufma wrote:
>
> > I am updating Sage on OSX 10.5. This is in a computer lab with about
> > 40 machines. There is an existing version of Sage on the machines.
> > Does the older version need to be uninstalled first?
It depends, you
On Mar 12, 12:33 pm, kaufma wrote:
> I am updating Sage on OSX 10.5. This is in a computer lab with about
> 40 machines. There is an existing version of Sage on the machines.
> Does the older version need to be uninstalled first?
Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Sage is self
