Re: [sage-support] Re: The results of some integration test.

2013-09-07 Thread Peter Luschny
> I have put the test suite in a Sage worksheet and added some comments. > I have moved the worksheet. It is now the public project 'CharlwoodFifty' at https://cloud.sagemath.com/ Unfortunately I do not know how to give a link to this project. Peter -- You received this message because yo

Re: [sage-support] Re: The results of some integration test.

2013-09-06 Thread Peter Luschny
> It would be great to have them in a file similar to wester.py. Can you > open a ticket? I have put the test suite in a Sage worksheet and added some comments. Perhaps this is useful? http://www.luschny.de/math/quad/CharlwoodIntegrationTest.sws Peter -- You received this message because you a

Re: [sage-support] Re: The results of some integration test.

2013-09-06 Thread kcrisman
> > > This is interesting, but especially because of your comment: > > > > A good answer gives FriCAS 1.2.1. It is a pitty that there is no > > option 'fricas' in the selection box of Sage's integration algorithm. > > > > That is not a bad idea; in fact, it is > > http://trac.sagemath.org/ti

Re: [sage-support] Re: The results of some integration test.

2013-09-05 Thread Burcin Erocal
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:28:05 -0700 (PDT) kcrisman wrote: > On Wednesday, September 4, 2013 1:01:07 PM UTC-4, Peter Luschny wrote: > > > > Recently two integration test suites were discussed at > > sci.math.symbolic [1], [2]. > > > > I executed the tests with Sage and put the results on my webpage

[sage-support] Re: The results of some integration test.

2013-09-04 Thread kcrisman
On Wednesday, September 4, 2013 1:01:07 PM UTC-4, Peter Luschny wrote: > > Recently two integration test suites were discussed at sci.math.symbolic > [1], [2]. > > I executed the tests with Sage and put the results on my webpage [3]. > Not all results are favorable for Sage. Maybe this is worth