On 7/19/12 3:52 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Oh, so it did change? What line? (I'm sure I could eventually find
this...)
See
https://github.com/sagemath/sagelib/blob/master/sage/plot/plot.py#L335
and the commits that touched that line.
In particular, look where DEFAULT_FIGSIZE was used in this
On 7/19/12 3:44 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 4:28:32 PM UTC-4, Jason Grout wrote:
On 7/19/12 3:13 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, July 19, 2012 4:00:17 PM UTC-4, ObsessiveMathsFreak
wrote:
>
> Upgrading to sage 5.1 did indeed fix th
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 4:28:32 PM UTC-4, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> On 7/19/12 3:13 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, July 19, 2012 4:00:17 PM UTC-4, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote:
> >
> > Upgrading to sage 5.1 did indeed fix the arrow issue. A note on
> > this: In 5.1 the de
On 7/19/12 3:13 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 4:00:17 PM UTC-4, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote:
Upgrading to sage 5.1 did indeed fix the arrow issue. A note on
this: In 5.1 the default size for images is significantly larger,
but this is controllable through figsize.
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 4:00:17 PM UTC-4, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote:
>
> Upgrading to sage 5.1 did indeed fix the arrow issue. A note on this: In
> 5.1 the default size for images is significantly larger, but this is
> controllable through figsize.
>
>
Yes, I've been noticing this all summer
Upgrading to sage 5.1 did indeed fix the arrow issue. A note on this: In
5.1 the default size for images is significantly larger, but this is
controllable through figsize.
As it turns out, matplotlib does not support arrows in axes. I cannot
fathom why, but it just doesn't unless you rip out th
On 7/14/12 5:13 PM, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote:
The current support for arrows in sage plots currently isn't very
satisfactory. Arrows have odd behaviour, and "fat" heads with no obvious
styling options. The following code
arrow2d((0, 0), (2, 3), color="red")+point((2,3))
Generates an arrow, but
