Thanks for the detailed reply, kcrisman. Yes, that first bit of code is now
working for me, too. I'm not sure what I was doing wrong before. Given the
temperamental nature of the current implementation of Piecewise(), I'm
inclined to avoid it altogether.
That prototype you pointed to, I see tha
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 8:29:16 PM UTC-5, Robert Jacobson wrote:
>
> I am having difficulty using Piecewise(). For example, I can define the
> following:
> t = Piecewise([[(-oo, -1), 0*x^0], [(-1, 0), 1+x], [(0, 1), 1-x], [(1, oo
> ), 0*x^0]], x)
> but then evaluating t(-100) fails.
>
Hmm,
