[sage-support] Re: Sequences and Series

2011-04-06 Thread Samuel Lelievre
On 30 mar, 20:58, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote: > I'm just wondering if there is a canonical (i.e. convienient(i.e. > lazy)) way to define simple sequences and series in sage. In > particular, is there a standard way to define recursive series? > > Suppose for example that You wanted to define the ser

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sequences and Series

2011-03-30 Thread A. Jorge Garcia
://shadowfaxrant.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/calcpage2009 -Original Message- From: kcrisman To: sage-support Sent: Wed, Mar 30, 2011 4:12 pm Subject: [sage-support] Re: Sequences and Series On Mar 30, 2:58 pm, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote: I'm just wondering if there is a canonical

[sage-support] Re: Sequences and Series

2011-03-30 Thread kcrisman
On Mar 30, 2:58 pm, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote: > I'm just wondering if there is a canonical (i.e. convienient(i.e. > lazy)) way to define simple sequences and series in sage. In > particular, is there a standard way to define recursive series? > > Suppose for example that You wanted to define th