On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 09:19:56PM -0700, Jeff Post wrote:
>
> Each time I upgraded the compiler I did a "make distclean", reran configure
> and make for sage.
why don't you use the gcc4 provided?
gcc -> gcc4
g++ -> g++4
...
[tru ~]$ sudo yum list gcc4\*
Setting up repositories
base
Each time I upgraded the compiler I did a "make distclean", reran configure
and make for sage.
Jeff
On Sunday 04 October 2009 18:34, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Jeff Post wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 October 2009 11:21, William Stein wrote:
> > > I just installed Centos 5
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Jeff Post wrote:
>
> On Sunday 04 October 2009 11:21, William Stein wrote:
> >
> > I just installed Centos 5.3 on both 32 and 64-bit machines yesterday
> > to do some testing, and Sage builds no problem with the default
> > compiler that they include by default, wh
On Sunday 04 October 2009 11:21, William Stein wrote:
>
> I just installed Centos 5.3 on both 32 and 64-bit machines yesterday
> to do some testing, and Sage builds no problem with the default
> compiler that they include by default, which is gcc-4.1.2.
>
After four hours the compile finished usi
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Jeff Post wrote:
>
> On Saturday 03 October 2009 17:32, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Jeff Post wrote:
>> > Hi all. After about an hour and a half of compiling, the build fails with
>> > errors due to segmentation faults in some test prog
On Saturday 03 October 2009 17:32, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Jeff Post wrote:
> > Hi all. After about an hour and a half of compiling, the build fails with
> > errors due to segmentation faults in some test programs. The relevant
> > information from the install log i
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Jeff Post wrote:
> Hi all. After about an hour and a half of compiling, the build fails with
> errors due to segmentation faults in some test programs. The relevant
> information from the install log is attached.
>
> Any help greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff