Thanks!
On Mar 14, 11:19 am, mabshoff wrote:
> Ok, there is now a 32 bit FC9 binary - I had it on sage.math all along
> and it did get lost in the shuffle when putting things in the various
> directories.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to th
Ok, there is now a 32 bit FC9 binary - I had it on sage.math all along
and it did get lost in the shuffle when putting things in the various
directories.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To un
On Mar 14, 10:24 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:16 AM, davidp wrote:
>
> > Is it strange, then, to list this binary under 32bit:
>
> >http://sagemath.org/bin/linux/32bit/index.html
>
> > Also, I don't see a release for i686. Perhaps that will come later.
>
> That's a mi
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:16 AM, davidp wrote:
>
> Is it strange, then, to list this binary under 32bit:
>
> http://sagemath.org/bin/linux/32bit/index.html
>
> Also, I don't see a release for i686. Perhaps that will come later.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
I *can't* make a 32-bit fedora binary right now
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:16 AM, davidp wrote:
>
> Is it strange, then, to list this binary under 32bit:
>
> http://sagemath.org/bin/linux/32bit/index.html
>
> Also, I don't see a release for i686. Perhaps that will come later.
That's a mistake. Michael can you fix it?
William
--~--~---
Is it strange, then, to list this binary under 32bit:
http://sagemath.org/bin/linux/32bit/index.html
Also, I don't see a release for i686. Perhaps that will come later.
Thanks,
Dave
On Mar 14, 8:37 am, Jaap Spies wrote:
> davidp wrote:
> > I am having trouble starting Sage 3.4 on two machine
davidp wrote:
> I am having trouble starting Sage 3.4 on two machines running Fedora:
>
> 1.
> poly> cd sage-3.4-Fedora_release_9-x86_64-Linux/
> poly> ./sage
> --
> | Sage Version 3.4, Release Date: 2009-03-11
