[sage-support] Re: Sage 3.2 released

2008-12-01 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 1, 10:09 am, Jim Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jim, > > That is an OSX 10.4 binary build on a G4. I am not 100% sure if it > > will be running on a G4. That G5 is the only 10.4 box we have access > > to 24/7 and it is also substantially faster (and has multiple CPUs) > > than any

[sage-support] Re: Sage 3.2 released

2008-12-01 Thread Jim Clark
On Nov 30, 2008, at 3:34 PM, mabshoff wrote: > On Nov 30, 1:58 pm, Jim Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I am puzzled by one of the binaries:http://sage.math.washington.edu/ >> sage/osx/powerpc/sage-3.2-G5-PowerMacintosh-Darwin.dmg >> >> Does the "G5" in the name mean it's specific for the G5

[sage-support] Re: Sage 3.2 released

2008-11-30 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 30, 3:49 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:43 PM, mabshoff > > In light of all of this, i.e. the names of binaries on sagemath.org > > are inconsistent I would suggest we either add an option to create > > binaries with canonical names (i.e. usi

[sage-support] Re: Sage 3.2 released

2008-11-30 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:43 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 30, 3:36 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, mabshoff >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > On Nov 30, 1:58 pm, Jim Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > H

[sage-support] Re: Sage 3.2 released

2008-11-30 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 30, 3:36 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, mabshoff > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 30, 1:58 pm, Jim Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Jim, > > >> I am puzzled by one of the binaries:http://sage.math.washington.edu/ >

[sage-support] Re: Sage 3.2 released

2008-11-30 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 30, 1:58 pm, Jim Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > >> I am puzzled by one of the binaries:http://sage.math.washington.edu/ >> sage/osx/powerpc/sage-3.2-G5-PowerMacintosh-Darwin.dmg >> >> Does the "G5" in t

[sage-support] Re: Sage 3.2 released

2008-11-30 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 30, 1:58 pm, Jim Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jim, > I am puzzled by one of the binaries:http://sage.math.washington.edu/ > sage/osx/powerpc/sage-3.2-G5-PowerMacintosh-Darwin.dmg > > Does the "G5" in the name mean it's specific for the G5 processor?   > Usually the binaries are nam