On Jan 4, 5:15 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kiran,
> If I describe my setup, it might seem less uncommon than you might
> have previously thought.
>
> Mine is a 64-bit box on a network consisting mostly of 32-bit
> machines. On my machine, /usr/bin is locally mounted,
If I describe my setup, it might seem less uncommon than you might
have previously thought.
Mine is a 64-bit box on a network consisting mostly of 32-bit
machines. On my machine, /usr/bin is locally mounted, and there is a
local 64-bit gcc there.
But /usr/local is NFS mounted, and there is a 32-
On Dec 29 2007, 1:58 am, "Kiran Kedlaya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I posted an install log (for SAGE 2.9.1.1) here:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kedlaya/install.log
>
> And re my compiler version: the result of gcc -v is:
>
> Using built-in specs.
> Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
> Con
I posted an install log (for SAGE 2.9.1.1) here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kedlaya/install.log
And re my compiler version: the result of gcc -v is:
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/sha
On Dec 27, 2007 9:37 PM, Adam Getchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2007 1:16 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Did you first run the VMware vmshrink utility, then turn the vmware
> > machine off and exit vmware before creating the 7z file? Also,
> > how big is your
On Dec 22, 2007 1:16 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you first run the VMware vmshrink utility, then turn the vmware
> machine off and exit vmware before creating the 7z file? Also,
> how big is your vmware-sage-deluxe when uncompressed?
vmshrink gives the result "disk compre
Hello Kiran,
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:05:29 -0800 (PST)
mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2:37 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tried sage -upgrade on my 64-bit RHEL5 box (Opteron 246), and the
> > upgrade dies pretty definitively at PolyBoRi. As far as I ca
On Dec 22, 2007 11:45 AM, Adam Getchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've created a VMWare image of Sage 2.9 running on gutsy with xubuntu-desktop.
Cool. This could be the vmware-sage-deluxe.7z version. We should have:
vmware-sage-minimal
vmware-sage-normal
vmware-sage-delu
Hi all,
I've created a VMWare image of Sage 2.9 running on gutsy with xubuntu-desktop.
Unfortunately, it's about 2.8G as a .zip file, or 2.2G as a .7z
(7-zip, a free Windows utility), using ultra compression on both.
I found that xfce seemed to be the only window manager that ran well
(gnome an
On Dec 19, 9:46 pm, "Adam Getchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007 10:27 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > what happens if you type
>
> > sudo sage -br
>
> I get the following errors during the process:
>
> sage/libs/mwrank/wrap.cc: In function 'double
> C
On Dec 19, 7:10 pm, davedo2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> You had advised me to try the following command to adjust the laptop's
> performance:
>
> /usr/bin/cpufreq-selector -g performance
>
> However, cpufreq-selector doesn't appear to be available for kubuntu
> 7.10, at least I cou
My guess is that the conversion from the old mwrank package to the new
cremona package is muddling things up.
John
On 19/12/2007, Adam Getchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2007 10:27 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > what happens if you type
> >
> > sudo sag
On Dec 18, 2007 10:27 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> what happens if you type
>
> sudo sage -br
I get the following errors during the process:
sage/libs/mwrank/wrap.cc: In function 'double
Curvedata_silverman_bound(const Curvedata*)':
sage/libs/mwrank/wrap.cc:81: error: 's
Michael,
You had advised me to try the following command to adjust the laptop's
performance:
/usr/bin/cpufreq-selector -g performance
However, cpufreq-selector doesn't appear to be available for kubuntu
7.10, at least I couldn't find it with either Adept or apt-get. I did
install everything tha
On Dec 18, 11:08 pm, Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ATLAS failed to compile for you. It is no surprise that starting Sage
> > afterwards fails. It isn't clear from the excerpt from the logs *why*
> > it failed, so please post the couple missing lines from there until
> > the end.
> ATLAS failed to compile for you. It is no surprise that starting Sage
> afterwards fails. It isn't clear from the excerpt from the logs *why*
> it failed, so please post the couple missing lines from there until
> the end. Main potential culprit is power management in your case.
> Turning that o
On Dec 18, 10:36 pm, davedo2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Willam,
Hi,
>
> The day after I had done a successful install from source of 2.8.15
> on
> my laptop (which is running kubuntu 7.10) the 2.9 release was
> announced.
It is a blessing and a curse to do about a release a week :)
> O
Willam,
The day after I had done a successful install from source of 2.8.15
on
my laptop (which is running kubuntu 7.10) the 2.9 release was
announced. OK, first I tried sage -upgrade, but after a LONG run that
failed with several error messages that regretfully I didn't capture.
I then dow
what happens if you type
sudo sage -br
then try sage -notebook again
- William
(Sent from my iPhone.)
On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:35 AM, "Adam Getchell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did sage -upgrade on 32-bit VMWare image. Upgrade works, but
> notebook doesn't:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
Did sage -upgrade on 32-bit VMWare image. Upgrade works, but notebook doesn't:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo sage -notebook
--
| SAGE Version 2.9, Release Date: 2007-12-16 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and
On Dec 17, 2:37 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kiran,
> I tried sage -upgrade on my 64-bit RHEL5 box (Opteron 246), and the
> upgrade dies pretty definitively at PolyBoRi. As far as I can tell, on
> the first file it is throwing lots of compile errors of the form
>
> /t
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 17, 1:50 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 17, 2007 7:31 AM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
[...]
# QUESTION: Upgrading Sage went fine, but now the banner still shows
the old version. How can I fix this?
# ANSWER: Tr
I tried sage -upgrade on my 64-bit RHEL5 box (Opteron 246), and the
upgrade dies pretty definitively at PolyBoRi. As far as I can tell, on
the first file it is throwing lots of compile errors of the form
/tmp/cciylcHI.s:17647: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
/tmp/cciylcHI.s:17697: Er
On Dec 17, 1:41 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a fresh 2.9 build on
> Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2220
>
> --testall just produxed this:
>
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/calculus.py
> Total time for all tests: 1424
On Dec 17, 1:50 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 7:31 AM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > mabshoff wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 17, 12:42 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >> I did a sage -upgrade to 2.9 and had no serious problems bu
On Dec 17, 2007 7:31 AM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> mabshoff wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Dec 17, 12:42 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >> I did a sage -upgrade to 2.9 and had no serious problems but just notices
> >> that
> >> the startup banner is missing "2.9". Is
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 17, 12:42 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I did a sage -upgrade to 2.9 and had no serious problems but just notices
>> that
>> the startup banner is missing "2.9". Is that just me?
>
> I think William reported something similar. To fix it see t
After a fresh 2.9 build on
Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2220
--testall just produxed this:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/calculus.py
Total time for all tests: 1424.9 seconds
Please see /home/jec/sage-2.9/tmp/test.log for the complete log fro
On Dec 17, 2007 6:56 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 17, 12:42 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 16, 2007 11:19 PM, mabshoff
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> >
> > > I ran sage "-testall -long" and sage "-testall -optional" on the
On Dec 17, 12:42 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2007 11:19 PM, mabshoff
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I ran sage "-testall -long" and sage "-testall -optional" on the 2.9
> > release on sage.math. While -long passed with flying colors, -optional
>
On Dec 16, 2007 11:19 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I ran sage "-testall -long" and sage "-testall -optional" on the 2.9
> release on sage.math. While -long passed with flying colors, -optional
> had some failures in tut.tex since I didn't install some optional GAP
> datab
Hello,
I ran sage "-testall -long" and sage "-testall -optional" on the 2.9
release on sage.math. While -long passed with flying colors, -optional
had some failures in tut.tex since I didn't install some optional GAP
database. But there are also some problems with maxima, which might
just be fall
On Dec 17, 3:58 am, "Craig Citro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sage 2.9 has been released. It is available at
>
> >http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
> So this built with no reported errors on my Mac Pro (Intel, 10.4.11).
> However, make check reported one error:
>
> sage -t deve
On Dec 16, 2007 11:04 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Sage 2.9 has been released. It is available at
>
>http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
> This is a *major* new release, with a huge number of tickets
> closed, and the additional of both R and the ATLAS BL
> Sage 2.9 has been released. It is available at
>
>http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
>
So this built with no reported errors on my Mac Pro (Intel, 10.4.11).
However, make check reported one error:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/stats/test.py
Just finished building it... it took over 7hours on my machine, but it
was worth it :)... btw - both 2 things about R are still actual in
2.9, that's "_" -> "." change for rpy to report version, and some
comments to enable optional package installation... apart from that it
is sweet :)... congratu
36 matches
Mail list logo
