On Dec 12, 2007 7:55 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tried to test it... but funny things, at first I wasn't able to
> install any package... take a look at this:
>
> gcc -std=gnu99 -I/opt/sage/local/lib/r//include -I/opt/sage/local/lib/
> r//include -I/usr/local/include WARN
tried to test it... but funny things, at first I wasn't able to
install any package... take a look at this:
gcc -std=gnu99 -I/opt/sage/local/lib/r//include -I/opt/sage/local/lib/
r//include -I/usr/local/include WARNING: ignoring environment value
of R_HOME -fvisibility=hidden -fpic -I/opt/sage
Hi,
I'm not very familiar with R and rpy, but in reading the rpy
documentation they implied that if you install optional R components
you do _not_ have to rebuild rpy...but I suppose someone should verify/
test that.
Marshall Hampton
On Dec 10, 6:03 pm, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On 10 Gru, 21:45, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 12:26 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > OK...
>
> > so I removed this file, and it is now never... well... seems that at
> > switch from experimental to optional something went wrong on my
On Dec 10, 2007 12:26 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK...
>
> so I removed this file, and it is now never... well... seems that at
> switch from experimental to optional something went wrong on my local
> machine... now it says:
>
> sage: import rpy
> sage: rpy.r
>
> ...
>
>
OK...
so I removed this file, and it is now never... well... seems that at
switch from experimental to optional something went wrong on my local
machine... now it says:
sage: import rpy
sage: rpy.r
...
/opt/sage/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/rpy.py in __repr__(self)
321
322 def
Well, now that's indeed strange... maybe old version that I had
installed from -experimental messed something up, and it doesn't
update this file so maybe it's old one?... this could explain why it
looks different... revision of this file is quite old, that's Id tag:
rpy.py 342 2007-02-20 16:41:47
On Dec 10, 2007 11:33 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Gru, 19:57, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 10, 2007 10:50 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > I've seen that R moved from experimental to optio
On 10 Gru, 19:57, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 10:50 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I've seen that R moved from experimental to optional, now as
> > r-2.6.1.p6, tryied it but got:
>
> > sage: import rpy
> > ---
On Dec 10, 2007 10:50 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've seen that R moved from experimental to optional, now as
> r-2.6.1.p6, tryied it but got:
>
> sage: import rpy
> ---
> Traceback (m
Hi,
I've seen that R moved from experimental to optional, now as
r-2.6.1.p6, tryied it but got:
sage: import rpy
---
Traceback (most recent call
last)
/home/giniu/ in ()
/opt/sage/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
On Dec 4, 10:30 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007, at 1:04 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > On Dec 4, 9:33 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Dec 3, 2007, at 23:27 , William Stein wrote:
> >> Still seeing mwrank crashing during the tests (10.5), b
On Dec 4, 2007, at 1:04 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Dec 4, 9:33 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 3, 2007, at 23:27 , William Stein wrote:
>> Still seeing mwrank crashing during the tests (10.5), but no comment
>> in the logs.
>
> Any chance you could narrow this down to a
On Dec 4, 9:33 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007, at 23:27 , William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello folks,
>
> > Sage 2.8.15 has been released. It is available at
>
> >http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
> Built and tested w/o errors on Mac OS X, as fol
On Dec 3, 2007, at 23:27 , William Stein wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Sage 2.8.15 has been released. It is available at
>
>http://sagemath.org/download.html
Built and tested w/o errors on Mac OS X, as follows, both with
"parallel make":
10.4.11 (Dual Quad-Core Xeon -j6):
real
oh, message at about same minute...btw... check out:
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/help/06/10/3553.html - seem there
is optional package that can deal with it
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubsc
I don't actually know, but as I mentioned before, even when I run
version from that package outside of sage, I get that error about
X11...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send e
On Dec 4, 2007 8:17 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was able to get the image to work last time I tried, so it's definitely
> > possible.
>
> when I do sage: r.png() I get:
>
> : Error in function (filename = "Rplot
> %03d.png", width = 480, height = 480, :
> X11 is not
On Dec 4, 2007 8:17 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was able to get the image to work last time I tried, so it's definitely
> > possible.
>
> when I do sage: r.png() I get:
>
> : Error in function (filename = "Rplot
> %03d.png", width = 480, height = 480, :
> X11 is not
> I was able to get the image to work last time I tried, so it's definitely
> possible.
when I do sage: r.png() I get:
: Error in function (filename = "Rplot
%03d.png", width = 480, height = 480, :
X11 is not available
and well.. that's both from console and notebook, and from plain
R /o
On Dec 4, 2007 7:51 AM, gginiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > sage: install_package('sage -i r-2.6.1rc.p1')
>
> I actually installed through command line, but it's mostly same - it
> went ok, but.
>
> > and report back whether the install works for you or not (it's an
> > experiment
Hi,
> sage: install_package('sage -i r-2.6.1rc.p1')
I actually installed through command line, but it's mostly same - it
went ok, but.
> and report back whether the install works for you or not (it's an experimental
> package still, which means that it's likely to *not* work for a lot of
>
On Dec 4, 2007 6:25 AM, gginiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > There already is an optional/experimental R.spkg and because of rpy
> > little integration work into Python needs to be done. It will probably
> > take a while to expose all the functionality desired by Sage
> > developers dir
On Dec 4, 3:25 pm, gginiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > There already is an optional/experimental R.spkg and because of rpy
> > little integration work into Python needs to be done. It will probably
> > take a while to expose all the functionality desired by Sage
> > developers directly
Hi,
> There already is an optional/experimental R.spkg and because of rpy
> little integration work into Python needs to be done. It will probably
> take a while to expose all the functionality desired by Sage
> developers directly, but we need to start by including it.
well, then if there is an
On Dec 4, 11:24 am, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WooHoo :)
>
> that's great news... I'm just upgrading it to look around asap... :)
>
> btw, is it really true that R interface is so-almost-ready that it
> could be included in release planned for end of week so in few days? I
>
WooHoo :)
that's great news... I'm just upgrading it to look around asap... :)
btw, is it really true that R interface is so-almost-ready that it
could be included in release planned for end of week so in few days? I
would be quite amazed to see it so soon :)
regards,
Andrzej Giniewicz.
--~--~
27 matches
Mail list logo
