> You used to be able to type
>
> sage -optional
>
> to get a list of all optional packages, but that seems to be broken now.
> Also, what I would do is implement the graphviz functions, and the error
> if graphviz is not present could suggest installing it.
>
> - Robert
I dont know about Graphvi
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> It's true that having Graphviz to plot our graphs would be very
> interesting I'd like to spend some time on this, but I sent a lot
> of patches to be reviewed already in the Graph section and I am not
> sure it is a good idea to send even more fo
It's true that having Graphviz to plot our graphs would be very
interesting I'd like to spend some time on this, but I sent a lot
of patches to be reviewed already in the Graph section and I am not
sure it is a good idea to send even more for the moment ^^;
There was a second question in my m
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Nathann Cohen wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> As we are dealing in Sage with a patch concerning the plotting of
>> Trees, I wondered why we were not using Graphviz to plot them.. The
>> answer is the usual one : Graphviz is not GPL-Uncompatible... Even
>> th
Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello
>
> As we are dealing in Sage with a patch concerning the plotting of
> Trees, I wondered why we were not using Graphviz to plot them.. The
> answer is the usual one : Graphviz is not GPL-Uncompatible... Even
> though, there is in Sage an optional package for Gra
