Hi Alex,
> I think it is better option (1), but where can I get 3.4.rcl? I don't
> see it in the website of Sage.
>
> In your opinion, which option is better?
>
I'd definitely go with option (1), as long as you don't mind leaving
it building for a few hours. Jaap was already nice enough to post
Alex Lara wrote:
>
> I think it is better option (1), but where can I get 3.4.rcl? I don't
> see it in the website of Sage.
>
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4/
> In your opinion, which option is better?
>
Compiling from source is straightforward, but takes so
Hi Craig,
I think it is better option (1), but where can I get 3.4.rcl? I don't
see it in the website of Sage.
In your opinion, which option is better?
---Alex
On 9 mar, 21:21, Craig Citro wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> > After I found a bug in sage 3.2.3 ( see Division error in Sage 3.3 but
> > not i
Hi Alex,
> After I found a bug in sage 3.2.3 ( see Division error in Sage 3.3 but
> not in Sage 3.1.1 posted march 7, 2009), I decided used sage 3.1.1.
> Now I have a problem with sage 3.1.1
> 1. the program generate the object H
> 2. save H
> 3. G =load(H)
>
So this is a pretty funky bug -- how
D'oh!
On Mar 9, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Justin Walker wrote:
>> FWIW, the problem shows in Sage 3.3 (the -1 and -2 entries are
>> interchanged; the rest show in the same order).
>
> There is no guarantee on the order of the elements when you iter
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Justin Walker wrote:
> FWIW, the problem shows in Sage 3.3 (the -1 and -2 entries are
> interchanged; the rest show in the same order).
There is no guarantee on the order of the elements when you iterate
through a dictionary.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~-
On Mar 9, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Alex Lara wrote:
>> Some idea of how to fix this?
>
> I don't have a copy of Sage 3.1.1 handy right now since it is so old.
> In Sage 3.4.rc0, I run your code and get H and G to be the same.
FWIW, the problem sh
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Alex Lara wrote:
> Some idea of how to fix this?
I don't have a copy of Sage 3.1.1 handy right now since it is so old.
In Sage 3.4.rc0, I run your code and get H and G to be the same.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this g
