Thank you for your answers !! I think I can build something from them
and from William's idea of a .__getitem__ function :-)
On Aug 27, 12:50 am, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Aug 26, 10:46 pm, Martin Albrecht
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > isn't the OP asking for the infinite polynomial ri
Hi Martin,
On Aug 26, 10:46 pm, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> isn't the OP asking for the infinite polynomial ring which Simon and Mike
> wrote?
I was wondering myself, of course.
But in Nathann's examples, the arguments to the dictionary variables
are any strings, e.g., y["g"]*y["h"] fr
Hi,
isn't the OP asking for the infinite polynomial ring which Simon and Mike
wrote?
sage: P. = InfinitePolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: x
Generator for the x's in Infinite polynomial ring in x over Rational Field
sage: x[0]
x0
sage: x[1]
x1
sage: x[2]
x2
Cheers,
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp
Hi Nathann,
On Aug 26, 6:53 pm, Nathann Cohen wrote:
[...]
> be able to live on the same ring... I would have liked to defined a
> "dictionary variable" x, once and forever, such that I can afterward
> add and multiplicate x["d"] and x["c"]..
There is a multitude of rings in Sage, and much depe
> I don't see the problem, because *anything* can be stored as value in
> a dictionary.
Your answer with a dictionary in which are stored variables is pretty
good, though there's a different with what I had in mind :
You first need to define each cell of the dictionary as a variable,
and you have
Hi Nathann,
On Aug 26, 6:08 pm, Nathann Cohen wrote:
[...]
> But I have two questions now :
> * Could it be possible to define variables indexed two times ?
> Something like y[0][1]*y[2][3] ?
> Could it even be possible to define "dictionary" variables ( I
> mean a dictionary of variab
