On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Simon King wrote:
>
> Dear Burcin,
>
> On 20 Mrz., 15:37, Burcin Erocal
> ...
> > I don't think comparing the methods implemented by two different
> > classes will be a good basis for testing an API specification
> > (assuming one day we write one). Mor
Dear Burcin,
On 20 Mrz., 15:37, Burcin Erocal
...
> I don't think comparing the methods implemented by two different
> classes will be a good basis for testing an API specification
> (assuming one day we write one). More specialized classes implement
> some functions, which the generic ones don't
Hi William,
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:19:12 -0700
William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Burcin Erocal
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
> > Simon King wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Dear supporters,
> >>
> >> multivariate polynomials have attr
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
> Simon King wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear supporters,
>>
>> multivariate polynomials have attributes lc(), lm(), lt() returning
>> their leading coefficent, leading monomial, or leading term.
Hi Simon,
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Simon King wrote:
>
> Dear supporters,
>
> multivariate polynomials have attributes lc(), lm(), lt() returning
> their leading coefficent, leading monomial, or leading term.
>
> Univariate polynomials have leading_coefficient(). It is not ni
