[sage-support] Re: Interface to Singular, symmetric powers

2017-05-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 8:17:41 AM UTC+1, Chris Brav wrote: > > Thanks. It seems that indeed some rings, such as ZZ and QQ, are too exotic > for Singular, this is a limitation of Singular - it appears that any ring in Singular must be either a polynomial ring or something derived from it,

[sage-support] Re: Interface to Singular, symmetric powers

2017-05-23 Thread Chris Brav
Caution to those who want to use this: Singular produces a symmetric power matrix in a basis that is the reverse of what you (or at least I) might expect. Which basis Singular chooses is clear if you test it on a diagonal matrix with variables as entries. -- You received this message because

[sage-support] Re: Interface to Singular, symmetric powers

2017-05-23 Thread Chris Brav
Thanks. It seems that indeed some rings, such as ZZ and QQ, are too exotic for Singular, and that you really have to base change to a polynomial ring over a field. Here is a little function definition which seems to work for any matrix defined over a domain: def sympow(A,d): R=A.base_ring()

[sage-support] Re: Interface to Singular, symmetric powers

2017-05-22 Thread Dima Pasechnik
it's a good plan, unless your A has exotic entries, so that a Singular polynomial ring with coefficients in this ring cannot be made. E.g. the following works: sage: R.=QQ[] sage: A=matrix(R,[[1,2],[3,4]]) sage: singular.symmetricPower(A._singular_(),3).sage() [64 48 36 27] [96 64 42 27] [48 28