Yes, that is exactly what I want...fractions/pi/etc to auto-
approximate. Or they don't even have to "auto" approximate, but if I
can just call a function that THEN approximates the fractions, pi,
etc. After I re-read my first post, it definitely wasn't very
clear :) But now you know. I wouldn
Yes, that is exactly what I want...fractions/pi/etc to auto-
approximate. Or they don't even have to "auto" approximate, but if I
can just call a function that THEN approximates the fractions, pi,
etc. After I re-read my first post, it definitely wasn't very
clear :) But now you know. I wouldn
Yes, that is exactly what I want...fractions/pi/etc to auto-
approximate. Or they don't even have to "auto" approximate, but if I
can just call a function that THEN approximates the fractions, pi,
etc. After I re-read my first post, it definitely wasn't very
clear :) But now you know. I wouldn
Yes, that is exactly what I want...fractions/pi/etc to auto-
approximate. Or they don't even have to "auto" approximate, but if I
can just call a function that THEN approximates the fractions, pi,
etc. After I re-read my first post, it definitely wasn't very
clear :) But now you know. I wouldn
On Oct 15, 8:31 pm, Scott wrote:
> What I really want is sage to give me the answer as:
> q1 = 0.58239...(however many digits)*q2
>
> Is there a way to do that? I don't want an approximate value of the
> entire thing (obviously you can't get that without giving the value of
> q2), but I want i
What I really want is sage to give me the answer as:
q1 = 0.58239...(however many digits)*q2
Is there a way to do that? I don't want an approximate value of the
entire thing (obviously you can't get that without giving the value of
q2), but I want it to compute whatever it can (in this case that
Dear Scott,
Thanks for posting.
On Oct 15, 6:46 pm, Scott wrote:
> I know this is really basic, but for some reason I cannot figure this
> out and my searching (here, sage website, google, etc) has not yielded
> me any results! I just started using sage, literally, yesterday.
>
> I am using s
