Joaquim Puig wrote:
> Thanks to all the comments. I will try to put them together and publish
> a workhseet with the comparisons.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Joaquim Puig
I created this ticket some time back for Mathematica
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6808
"Implement a benchmark based on Ka
Thanks to all the comments. I will try to put them together and publish
a workhseet with the comparisons.
Best wishes,
Joaquim Puig
En/na Tim Lahey ha escrit:
>
> On Oct 22, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Nasser Abbasi wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> how do you run matlab command from sage like this above? I have
On Oct 22, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Nasser Abbasi wrote:
Hi,
how do you run matlab command from sage like this above? I have sage
4.1.2 and matlab 2008b installed on my windows XP PC, but when I run
the above, it tells me it can't start matlab:
a = random_matrix(RDF,2000)
timeit('a*a')
5 loops, bes
On Oct 22, 11:59 am, William Stein wrote:
>
> Here's a benchmark (the first thing I tried):
>
> sage: a = random_matrix(RDF,2000)
> sage: timeit('a*a')
> 5 loops, best of 3: 1.8 s per loop
> sage: b = matlab('rand(2000)')
> sage: timeit('b*b')
> 5 loops, best of 3: 3.4 s per loop
>
> Sage is t
On Oct 22, 6:59 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Here's a benchmark (the first thing I tried):
nice+thx for this idea, i did the same on my machine using matlab
2009a (most recent i guess?)
sage: a = random_matrix(RDF,2000)
sage: timeit('a*a')
5 loops, best of 3: 3.28 s per loop
sage: b = matlab('r
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Marshall Hampton wrote:
>
> You might find this helpful:
>
> http://www.scipy.org/PerformancePython
>
> Generally I think numpy's numerical linear algebra is comparable to
> matlab's.
>
> -Marshall
Here's a benchmark (the first thing I tried):
sage: a = random_m
You might find this helpful:
http://www.scipy.org/PerformancePython
Generally I think numpy's numerical linear algebra is comparable to
matlab's.
-Marshall
On Oct 22, 8:15 am, Harald Schilly wrote:
> not really, at least not that i'm aware of. you should ask this at
> numpy/scipy since they a
not really, at least not that i'm aware of. you should ask this at
numpy/scipy since they are much more similar to matlab ... (these
libraries are part of sage)
basically, python is slower in some respect, e.g. loops, since they
involve much more complex objects (i.e. python objects!). on the othe
Hi Joaquim!
On 22 Okt., 14:22, Joaquim Puig wrote:
> ... Is there any set of
> benchmarks of SAGE vs Matlab?
I don't know about Matlab. But there is
http://www.sagemath.org/tour-benchmarks.html
which is Sage vs. Magma. So, if nothing else is available, it might be
better than nothing.
Cheers,
