[sage-support] Re: Arithmetic Progession syntax

2011-04-01 Thread achrzesz
sage: import scipy as sc sage: map(floor,sc.arange(0.0,1.2,0.1)) [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1] On 1 Kwi, 21:17, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote: > Thanks for that, but I've run into another issue. I don't know whether > this is related to the sequence syntax or not > > sage: for n in [0.0,0.1,..

[sage-support] Re: Arithmetic Progession syntax

2011-04-01 Thread Jason Grout
On 4/1/11 2:17 PM, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote: Thanks for that, but I've run into another issue. I don't know whether this is related to the sequence syntax or not sage: for n in [0.0,0.1,..,1.1]: sage: print n, floor(n) 0.000 0 0.100 0 0.200 0 0.30

[sage-support] Re: Arithmetic Progession syntax

2011-04-01 Thread ObsessiveMathsFreak
Thanks for that, but I've run into another issue. I don't know whether this is related to the sequence syntax or not sage: for n in [0.0,0.1,..,1.1]: sage: print n, floor(n) 0.000 0 0.100 0 0.200 0 0.300 0 0.400 0 0.500 0

Re: [sage-support] Re: Arithmetic Progession syntax

2011-04-01 Thread Mike Hansen
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:08 PM, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote: >> sage: [0,0.2,..,1] >> [0.000, 0.200, 0.400, >> 0.600, 0.800, 1.00] > > May sage installation appears to be having trouble with this syntax > > OK Here > sage: [0.0,

[sage-support] Re: Arithmetic Progession syntax

2011-04-01 Thread ObsessiveMathsFreak
> sage: [0,0.2,..,1] > [0.000, 0.200, 0.400, > 0.600, 0.800, 1.00] May sage installation appears to be having trouble with this syntax OK Here sage: [0.0,0.2,..,0.9] [0.000, 0.200, 0.400, 0

[sage-support] Re: Arithmetic Progession syntax

2011-03-28 Thread Jason Grout
On 3/28/11 6:28 AM, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote: This is a simple question, but I can't find anything in the documentation about it. I would like to declare a simple arithmetic sequence in sage. I use this a lot for discrete plots, etc. In octave, syntax such as [0:0.1:1] returns the sequence 0.0

Re: [sage-support] Re: Arithmetic Progession syntax

2011-03-28 Thread Mike Hansen
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:57 PM, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote: > Thank you. That is more or less what I was looking for. > > However, is there any shorthand way of getting srange to include the > final endpoint? While > srange(0,1.0,0.1,include_endpoint=True) > works, it is somewhat more verbose than

[sage-support] Re: Arithmetic Progession syntax

2011-03-28 Thread ObsessiveMathsFreak
Thank you. That is more or less what I was looking for. However, is there any shorthand way of getting srange to include the final endpoint? While srange(0,1.0,0.1,include_endpoint=True) works, it is somewhat more verbose than I am used to. On Mar 28, 12:45 pm, David Joyner wrote: > On Mon, Mar