> I can't believe there isn't also a similarly easy to use JupyterHub
> docker image though, which is surely well maintained. Has anybody
> looked?
>
>
That's kind of why I asked.
> All that said, I'm pretty optimistic that I (or somebody) will find
> time to make a new cocalc Docker imag
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:28 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 6:24 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> >
> >> The standard solution is Jupyterhub. That's a non-trivial undertaking to
> >> set up, though. The processes for the users run in dedicated docker
> >> containers. sagenb was a lot easi
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 6:24 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> The standard solution is Jupyterhub. That's a non-trivial undertaking to
>> set up, though. The processes for the users run in dedicated docker
>> containers. sagenb was a lot easier for this, but never properly secure. I
>> wouldn't dare asking
> The standard solution is Jupyterhub. That's a non-trivial undertaking to
> set up, though. The processes for the users run in dedicated docker
> containers. sagenb was a lot easier for this, but never properly secure. I
> wouldn't dare asking a sysadmin to deploy a sagenb server. Jupyterhub
On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 7:14:32 AM UTC-7, Francisco de Arriba wrote:
>
> We can try to move into Jupyter. But we found two new problems, how can we
> do to start a Jupyter server for multiple users accounts (using a command
> line like in notebook(accounts=True))
>
The standard solution is J
We can try to move into Jupyter. But we found two new problems, how can we
do to start a Jupyter server for multiple users accounts (using a command
line like in notebook(accounts=True)) and how can we transform .sws to a
compatible extension in Jupyter?
El viernes, 27 de abril de 2018, 22:00:3
sagenb is deprecated, and fixing this is a very low priority (people who
wrote sagenb moved on, supporting 10+ years old web application code is
not easy at all)
Could you move on to using jupyter notebooks?
On Friday, April 27, 2018 at 3:35:34 PM UTC+1, Francisco de Arriba wrote:
>
> Hello,
