[sage-support] Re: 10.6 - 64bit binary

2009-10-19 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:40 PM, David M. Monarres wrote: > > Is there a good reason to use the 64 bit 10.6 binaries when there > seems to be quite a few failed doctests (at least on my machine)?  Is > there a good reason to use the 64 bit binaries when they are still > buggy and the 32-bit 10.5

[sage-support] Re: 10.6 - 64bit binary

2009-10-19 Thread David M. Monarres
yes. -- David Monarres dmmonar...@gmail.com "There... I've run rings 'round you logically" -- Monty Python's Flying Circus On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:45 PM, William Stein wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:40 PM, David M. Monarres > wrote: >> >> Is there a good reason to use the 64 bit 10.6 binar

[sage-support] Re: 10.6 - 64bit binary

2009-10-19 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:40 PM, David M. Monarres wrote: > > Is there a good reason to use the 64 bit 10.6 binaries when there > seems to be quite a few failed doctests (at least on my machine)?  Is > there a good reason to use the 64 bit binaries when they are still > buggy and the 32-bit 10.5