Replying to myself. Somehow a rerun on this worked (weird). However,
the output is 7.099e-27, not 7.099 \times 10$^{-27}$.
On Mar 3, 11:03 am, sm123123 wrote:
> :)
>
> I tried the \percent macro.
>
> I got:
>
> File "problemset.py", line 39
>
egin{sagesilent} ...
\end{sagesilent} environment.
On Mar 3, 3:19 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 at 07:34PM -0800, sm123123 wrote:
> > I tried using the format specs in SageTeX:
>
> > \newcommand{\sagenum}[1]{\sage{''temp1=#1;%12.3e"%temp1}}
>
>
} environment.
On Mar 3, 3:19 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 at 07:34PM -0800, sm123123 wrote:
> > I tried using the format specs in SageTeX:
>
> > \newcommand{\sagenum}[1]{\sage{''temp1=#1;%12.3e"%temp1}}
>
> > This fails to compile as
aTeX), Sage
chokes on the code.
Catch 22.
On Mar 2, 3:54 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 3/2/11 12:04 PM, sm123123 wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to handle scientific precision in base 10 in a simple
> > way, using sage ?
>
> Yes. You could just use normal floating point numbers a
d in itself.
I have nothing against mathematicians (btw).
On Mar 1, 3:23 pm, sm123123 wrote:
> No.
>
> I use matlab extensively for data analysis and have a large library of
> code already written in matlab.
>
> I do not want to invest the time required in porting all that.
>
alled), but have you considered using pyplot (from matplotlib)?
> It's basically a clone of the Matlab plotting framework. I've used it
> recently to make a semilog plot with excellent results.
>
> On 1 mar, 12:57, sm123123 wrote:
>
>
>
> > Sigh.
>
> &g
Sigh.
When I issue a plot() command using the Matlab interface, I get a
syntax error.
On Mar 1, 5:43 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 at 11:32AM -0800, sm123123 wrote:
> > It seems that I was unable to convey the issue at hand. For
> > Mathematica, I can issue a
matlab.
Sage does have a matlab interface which (presumably) can accept
textual commands.
On Feb 28, 12:13 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> I'll skip your first question for the moment, since I'm not sure about
> the answer there.
>
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 at 12:59PM -0800, sm123123 wrot
).
Alternatively, is there support for printf formats (C) ?
On Feb 28, 4:46 am, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Sunday, February 27, 2011 8:59:25 PM UTC, sm123123 wrote:
>
> > I have numerical calculations that need to adhere to significant
> > digits of the input.
>
> Sage has at lea
I am new to sage and trying to use it as a part of SageTeX.
I have numerical calculations that need to adhere to significant
digits of the input. I have tried to use round(x,n) to get n
significant digits. However, this method fails miserably for very
small numbers (think 1.67e-17, which returns z
10 matches
Mail list logo
