and why it worked in previous versions.
>
> Le 24/03/2020 à 14:13, mendes a écrit :
> > Dear all,
> >
> > In previous versions of Sagemath, this worked fine:
> >
> > f= 1/(1-x)
> > print( maxima(f,x).powerseries(x,0) )
> >
> > Now, in Sage 9.0,
Dear all,
In previous versions of Sagemath, this worked fine:
f= 1/(1-x)
print( maxima(f,x).powerseries(x,0) )
Now, in Sage 9.0, this raises the error:
TypeError: new_name must be a string
I would be very grateful for any help.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Dear all,
In previous versions of Sage I was able to do very quickly some *
numerical* integrations involving unit_step(t) function .
But, in the last updates (8.9 and 9.0) , it takes 6 times longer to do
the numerical integral of convolution with unit_step(), than to do the
same oper
Thank you Bruin and Kcrisman, for your attention.
The following codes are examples of the problem:
# fg denotes the convolution product f*g. The expected result is f*g = 0,
if t < 1 and f*g = t^2/2-t+1/2, if t > 1.
# For 0 < t < 1, it runs ok:
var('x,t')
assume(01, there is a RuntimeError: mis
Dear all,
In previous versions of Sagemath, I was able to do perfectly the (symbolic)
integration of functions like unit_step( ), for example when doing symbolic
convolutions.But in the latest versions of Sagemath (like 8.9 and the updated
9.0) the following message appears:*RuntimeErr
