[sage-support] Re: zero

2009-12-13 Thread marcW
; > Hi Marc! > > > On 12 Dez., 15:48, Jason Grout wrote: > >> marcW wrote: > > [...] > >> If you don't care about precision (i.e., all numbers are rounded off to > >> 2-3 digits), then you can declare your numbers this way: > > >> sage: R=Real

[sage-support] Re: zero

2009-12-12 Thread marcW
rinted and trims to a desired (printing) precision maybe? would suit everybody I guess. It's not even about zeros: all i need is two digits after the dot, exceptionally 3 (yes, it's economics, a 2 digit science) thanks again m On 12 dec, 14:38, Jason Grout wrote: > marcW wrote: > >

[sage-support] Re: zero

2009-12-12 Thread marcW
very sorry, I ran into this, but I have no clue what to do to with it, as I said I am new to all this. thank you On 11 dec, 19:36, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote: > fixed inhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7356 > > On 11 pro, 19:18, marcW wrote: > > > h

[sage-support] Re: zero

2009-12-12 Thread marcW
1v=f1.subs(J=a-alpha_A-alpha_B).subs(values) show(f1v) On 11 dec, 19:32, Jason Grout wrote: > marcW wrote: > > hi, > > I'm new at this, some experience with mathematica. > > I spent the better part of 2 days trying to find out why > > f= a*x > > g=f.

[sage-support] zero

2009-12-11 Thread marcW
hi, I'm new at this, some experience with mathematica. I spent the better part of 2 days trying to find out why f= a*x g=f.subs({a:0.6}] show(g) produces so many zeroes.lol. It's laughable. I've never seen something like this. It shouldn't be complicated to get rid of these zeros right? -- To po