y prime 5.
>>
>> If you do F.isogeny_class(reducible_primes=[3,5]) you get the same as for
>> E (but you have to so that in a fresh Sage session becauses of caching of
>> previously computed results).
>>
>> John Cremona
>>
>> On Friday, 24 November 2
Hi,
In some work on isogeny clases, my team ran across the following of two
elliptic curves which are isogenous but sage reports different isogeny
classes for them. Is there some technicalities (j = 0) leading to
incorrect output or is this something that we should flag a bug?
sage: L5. =
ffect.
On Wednesday, September 1, 2021 at 2:27:46 PM UTC-5 hbetx9 wrote:
> As the directory is in /opt and ownership is root.root, I can't run this
> as it gets permission denied when writing the log file.
>
> On Wednesday, September 1, 2021 at 2:08:56 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wro
-build-from-source
> point 4 ("./configure --prefix")
>
> On Wednesday, September 1, 2021 at 12:00:15 PM UTC-7 hbetx9 wrote:
>
>> So I got this working in my home directory but want the SageMath
>> directory system wide. I moved it to /opt and changed ownershi
config/make that I can run on this directory to get it to work as a system
wide install?
On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 4:22:10 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 12:55:46 PM UTC-7 hbetx9 wrote:
>
>> On my system, python2 and python3 is installed, but
On my system, python2 and python3 is installed, but there is no generic
python symlink. Does this need to be created for sage and if so should it
be python3? In installed from tarball, so this is not an issue with the
Ubuntu package.
On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 9:13:49 AM UTC-5 hbetx9 wrote
21 at 4:49:52 PM UTC-5 hbetx9 wrote:
> The package log has the following error:
>
> /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sage/combinat/root_system/branching_rules.py:1753:
>
> SyntaxWarning: "is not" with a literal. Did you mean "!="?
> if len(stypes) is not 2:
&
The package log has the following error:
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sage/combinat/root_system/branching_rules.py:1753:
SyntaxWarning: "is not" with a literal. Did you mean "!="?
if len(stypes) is not 2:
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py:1159:
SyntaxWarning: 'str'
April 9, 2020 at 12:35:58 PM UTC-7, hbetx9 wrote:
>>
>> I htink I know what I did, somehow I change the prefix to a directory
>> that didn't exist. I'm recompiling to see if the error is fixed.
>>
>> Boy does this compile take a LONG time, is that the same
I htink I know what I did, somehow I change the prefix to a directory that
didn't exist. I'm recompiling to see if the error is fixed.
Boy does this compile take a LONG time, is that the same for everyone?
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-5, hbetx9 wrote:
>
0 at 8:01:38 PM UTC-7, hbetx9 wrote:
>>
>> No, I just want all users to have this at default. Where should I put the
>> SAGE_ROOT directory? /usr/local?
>>
>
> Use "./configure --prefix=/usr/local/opt/sage-9.0" to set the installation
> prefix (S
No, I just want all users to have this at default. Where should I put the
SAGE_ROOT directory? /usr/local?
On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 9:36:33 PM UTC-5, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:30 AM hbetx9 >
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29379 for the
> change ticket that makes the upgrade to R 3.6.3
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:02:01 PM UTC-7, hbetx9 wrote:
>>
>> I _almost_ got this to work, I have R 3.6.3 but still get the following
>> error:
>>
>> * packag
3.6.3
correct?
After all this is addressed, how to make this available system wide? Is
there a script in the SAGE_LOCAL that will do it? I know that's a basic
question but I'm curious. I removed Sage 8 so there should be no conflict.
On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 12:56:29 PM UTC
On second thought, I should just fix this now.
Am I correct I need to install package r-3.6.2 and rebuld?
On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 11:54:39 AM UTC-5, hbetx9 wrote:
>
> Tried from source and got this error:
>
> Error building Sage.
>
> The following package(s) may ha
Thanks, I'll have to make that adjustment, at the moment I have two
versions of sage, so I need to figure out how to make it just version 9
first. Otherwise my home .sage directory won't drive behavior of the things
in SAGE_ROOT/local correct?
On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 12:15:53 PM UTC-5
echnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:05 AM hbetx9 >
> wrote:
>
> > I installed from package on Mint 19.3. I'm happy to run whatever is
> needed to help diagnose. For context, I have installed python 2.7.17 and
> the package pulled sage 8.1. I'm not
Hi Dima.
I installed from package on Mint 19.3. I'm happy to run whatever is
needed to help diagnose. For context, I have installed python 2.7.17 and
the package pulled sage 8.1. I'm not sure why the packages didn't pull the
most up to date. Is there a PPA I need to add?
Best,
Lance
On S
Hi Sage Community,
After reviewing this oustanding piece of software, I would like to
utilize it to solve some problems I've been working on. However I have
one question that the documentation has not provided a solution for.
Is there a way have symbolic lists or lists of symbolic variables? O
19 matches
Mail list logo
