On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 4 Sep., 01:53, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
>> Is SAGE_NCPUS used anywhere?
>
> Well, I was not suggesting to introduce an environment variable that
> is used anywhere in Sage except to "tame" my test script. Of course,
> if there
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a list of computations (in fact, a test suite), and I'd like to
> do them in parallel. Of course, I could use @parallel, but:
> 1) each computation uses 3 processes (Sage, GAP, Singular)
> 2) it is probably not nice to other use
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a list of computations (in fact, a test suite), and I'd like to
> do them in parallel. Of course, I could use @parallel, but:
> 1) each computation uses 3 processes (Sage, GAP, Singular)
> 2) it is probably not nice to other use
My guess is that the web server has a limit on the size of a POST
request and that you have reached it. Typically this is 1024kb. The
solution is to increase this limit. I'm not sure how to do that for a
wsgi application (which I assume sage is).
didier
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Stan Schym
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:04 AM, cesarnda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do this, also vi can do that. The reason I asked this question was
> just to know standard editor you are using to program in cython. Maybe
> I could have found out about another editor.
I use emacs, which has a decent pyrex/cy
much more
> complicated function.
You're right, John. I guess I was being a little selfish: sometimes I
mix up symbolic and complex numbers and it usually catches up to me
several lines down a computation (or gets really slow).
didier
>
> John
>
> 2008/5/9 didier deshomm
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rose,
>
> Second, it becomes pretty long went there are complex numbers in my
> Tuples (more than 30 secondes for 7 elements).
This does take time, interestingly when the numbers are symbolic:
{{{
sage: f=range(6)
sage: %time T
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> a very beginner question, if I change some .pyx files and want them to
> be recompiled, I thought I need to do "sage -b", like this:
>
> $ ./sage -b
>
> --
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 7, 12:42 am, Nikos Apostolakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Didier mentioned floor(); if you actually want to round, instead of
> > > taking the floor, then this wo
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Nikos Apostolakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Nikos Apostolakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> He
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Nikos Apostolakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello group,
>
> Is the following behavior a bug, or am I missing some fundamental
> understanding about how Integer works?
>
> ,
> | sage: num = RealField(12).random_element(1,9.99)
> | sage: num
> | 3.18
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> didier deshommes wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> dean moore wrote:
> >> > When I was
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> dean moore wrote:
> > When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to
> > report it. Do the following
> > in an online SAGE notebook:
> >
> > /1+1/
> >
> > We get two. Now run the following:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > SAGE now tries to support numpy (and matlab)-style indexing, by poking
> > at its underlying __getitem__ and __getslic
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In numpy:
>
> In [11]: A[2:4]
> Out[11]:
> array([[ 1, 1, 2, -1],
>[ 2, -1, 1, -1]])
>
> (Or A[2:4,0:4].)
>
>
> >>> # a column
> >>> sage: A.matrix_from_rows_and_columns([1..2],[0..0])
> >>> [14]
>
William,
Would you mind making this a blog post? This is a great reference of
how interfaces work in Sage.
didier
2007/12/13, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I figured out a clean way to have this sort of notation work in
> Mathematica etc. rom Sage when
> I was hiking with my wife in Sedon
On 11/2/07, Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I take the opportunity to ask why the unknown 'x' is special in Sage:
Mostly convenience since most people use x for a polynomial or the
name of a variable. In earlier versions x was defined to be the
polynomial x, now it's a symbolic varia
2007/9/26, David Stahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I am trying to find what variables have zero as a coefficient and have
> been unsuccessful. Here is what I tried:
>
> I2=I.groebner_basis()
> f=SR(I2[0])
> g=f.coeff()
> print g
> 0
At first glance, g=='0' asks whether g is equal to 0 as a *s
2007/8/10, Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi again everyone,
>
> I'm playing around with this project exploring Hasse's theorem for
> Elliptic Curves over prime order field and playing with the
> distributions that I get. The bottom line is that I execute alot of
> lines like this:
>
> --
2007/7/12, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Is there a way to install sage so that no source files are deleted? I
> am interested in hacking the cddlib source that is used in polymake,
> but it looks like it gets deleted after compilation. Is there an
Every .spkg file is bascially a t
On 6/20/07, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I now want to do some loops and update certain entries of the matrix.
> But the entries seem immutable, e.g. one can do:
>
> my_matrix[0][0] += 1
>
> and the entry is still zero, although no exception seems to be raised.
>
> So my question
On 4/29/07, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and I would have a fully functional environment, I think that would be
> awesome. Are you considering getting it into Debian? I am not sure if
> it is a problem, that the binary package will be like 100MB.
Recently there has been talk about m
On 4/23/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/23/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> matrix_from_rows_and_columns( )
Thanks, I knew there was something I was missing. Any chance of
aliasing this function to "submatrix()"? Becaus
Hi there,
How do I make submatrices (or minors, or block submatrices) in SAGE? I
have a 5x5 matrix
{{{
[0 1 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 1]
[0 0 0 1 0]
[ 5/3-2-1 2/3 5/3]
[-17/3 1 4 4/3 1/3]
}}}
and I would like to extract fr
On 4/16/07, Gary Bunting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have been trying to use some of my python code in sage but
> have been having problems, apparently because sage implements
> generic arithmetic differently to python.
Hi Gary,
The SAGE preparser is your problem. If you run the preparser on
On 3/28/07, Jonathan William Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all. I just upgraded (by running sage -upgrade) and I am having the
> problem shown down below.
>
> Some things that I have tried include running sage with the command
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home/bober/sage-2.3/local/lib/"
> SAGE
On 2/21/07, Iftikhar Burhanuddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Random sparse matrices over finite fields generated by SAGE do not look
> sparse to me. Bug?
>
> sage: Mat(GF(17), 10, sparse=True).random_element()
Ifti,
looking at the docs for random_element(), it looks like you nee
On 2/9/07, carlM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Latest update fails to build on fedora6, fortran compiler internal
> error. tail of make output:
>
> Making install in fortran
> make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/extra/hcmeyer/sage/sage-1.5/spkg/
> build/quaddouble-2.2/src/fortran'
> f95 -O2 -ffree-f
On 2/9/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had a question about nth roots. I did not know about nth_root. I
> tried searching for root, nth, and n using tab but did not find
> nth_root. Also nth_root? gives me nothing. It is kind of confusing for
> me.
It's a function of associat
On 2/8/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Didier,
>
> Would RealLib, which still hasn't fully made its way into SAGE, be very
> relevant
> to this question? Can it somehow decide equality of some class of real
> numbers
> defined via an algorithm (e.g., sqrt(2) + 1 - 1 is defined by
On 2/8/07, Luis Finotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks! I could not find that in the Reference Manual...
>
> On the other hand, it seems that Sage (or Python) does not handle
> equality of reals very well:
Hi,
this is most likey due to rounding errors. The equality holds for fractions:
{{{
On 1/30/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all:
>
> In trying to compute the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the
> discrete Fourier transformation for Z/5Z for a class I'm teaching,
> I came across the following:
>
> sage: MS = MatrixSpace(CyclotomicField(5),5,5)
> sage: z = Cyc
32 matches
Mail list logo
