[sage-support] Re: Matrix polynomial

2013-12-05 Thread ccandide
OK, i get it now, checking the doc gives me the following answer : sage: M=matrix([(1, -3, -1),(0, 1, 1),(-1, 2, 1)]) sage: R. = QQ[] sage: P=X^2 sage: P.subs(M) [ 2 -8 -5] [-1 3 2] [-2 7

[sage-support] Matrix polynomial

2013-12-05 Thread ccandide
How do you evaluate a matrix polynomial with Sage ? The obvious way doesn't work : sage: P=x^2 sage: P(x=4) 16 sage: M=matrix([(1, -3, -1),(0, 1, 1),(-1, 2, 1)]) sage: P(x=M) --

[sage-support] Re: exact eigenvalues

2013-11-07 Thread ccandide
Le jeudi 7 novembre 2013 18:19:39 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit : > > > sage: b._exact_value() > a - 1 where a^2 - 2 = 0 and a in -1.414213562373095? > It is reassuring to see that we can recover the exact value! thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

[sage-support] Re: exact eigenvalues

2013-11-07 Thread ccandide
Le jeudi 7 novembre 2013 18:28:31 UTC+1, Nils Bruin a écrit : > > On Thursday, November 7, 2013 9:00:36 AM UTC-8, ccandide wrote: >> >> I dont' understand why Sage is unable to give an exact expression for the >> eigenvalues of the following matrix : >&

[sage-support] exact eigenvalues

2013-11-07 Thread ccandide
I dont' understand why Sage is unable to give an exact expression for the eigenvalues of the following matrix : sage: A= matrix([[0,1],[1,-2]]) sage: [a for a,_,_ in A.eigenvectors_right()] [-2.414213562373095?, 0.4142135623730951?] The characteristic polynomial is very simple : sage: A.charpo

[sage-support] SageCloud worksheet and the sws format

2013-10-10 Thread ccandide
Sage Notebook has nice editing capabilities allowing the user to create rich style worksheets making a worksheet far more than a sequence of cells input/output. Does the new sagecloud provide the same rich text features ? How to import a sws file into a sageCloud worksheet ? -- You received th

[sage-support] Re: Retrieving Sage source-code for reviewing not for building

2013-02-11 Thread ccandide
> > > > The core Sage library is in the file spkg/standard/sage-5.6.spkg, so you > can unpack that to see a lot of source code. > Great, exactly what I was looking for! > (You can also browse the source code on-line at < > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/browser>.) > I was aware of

[sage-support] Retrieving Sage source-code for reviewing not for building

2013-02-11 Thread ccandide
I have downloaded Sage 5.6 source-code at http://www.sagemath.org/download-source.html in order to review the Python code written to implement the graph theory module. After decompressing, I have been surprised to see that no python/Cython/C code was available, only spkg files. I spotted a file

[sage-support] Re: Sage 4.0 can be installed on ubuntu 8.04?

2009-06-08 Thread ccandide
On 8 juin, 03:25, Bruce Cohen wrote: > I installed this binary: > sage-4.0-linux-Debian_GNU_Linux_4.0_etch-sse2-i686-Linux > on my ubuntu 8.04 machine.   For information : wich processor ? how many RAM ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email

[sage-support] Re: Error installing linbox

2009-06-05 Thread ccandide
On 5 juin, 11:01, William Stein wrote: > you are using " version gcc 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)".  You might > also increase available swap space. !! I installed Ubuntu with no swap space : $ top top - 11:23:02 up 9:51, 6 users, load average: 1.68, 0.97, 0.57 Tasks: 119 total, 3 ru

[sage-support] Re: Sage 4.0 installation : illegal instruction

2009-06-05 Thread ccandide
On 5 juin, 10:53, William Stein wrote: > Maybe you should install Python + sympy + numpy + matplotlib?  That > would give you programming, linear algebra, symbolic calculus, and > programming. OK but what about the interface ? The Sage Firefox interface is very handy. And students accustomed t

[sage-support] Re: Sage 4.0 installation : illegal instruction

2009-06-05 Thread ccandide
On 5 juin, 09:42, William Stein wrote: > So, build from source.  It's easy. I'm very unlucky with Sage : - compiling it from sources doesn't work on my computer (I am going to post a new thread about this). - Windows binaries don't run on my computer as I explained here : http://groups.goog

[sage-support] Re: Sage 4.0 installation : illegal instruction

2009-06-05 Thread ccandide
On 5 juin, 05:47, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > I'd recommend compiling from source, especially given a processor of   > that age (though it might take quite a while given your clockspeed). "a processor of that age" ??? "your clockspeed" Pentium 4 (1.60GHz) + 512 MB ram is not hardware for

[sage-support] Sage 4.0 installation : illegal instruction

2009-06-04 Thread ccandide
I failed to install Sage 3.4.2 and I was hoping the last Sage 4.0 version would fix the problem. Unfortunately, the install fails again with the same error message : cand...@candide-desktop:~/sage-4.0-linux-Ubuntu_9.04-sse2-i686-Linux $ ./sage -

[sage-support] Re: Problem Sage 3.4 windows XP

2009-05-22 Thread ccandide
I'm not very lucky with the Sage software : binaries don't work under Ubuntu (cf. my recent post on this forum) and, on the other and, under Windows XP, I'm experimenting exactly the same problem as above. More, under Ubuntu, sources don't compile without error. So I even cannot try Sage, whatever

[sage-support] Re: Unable to install Sage

2009-05-21 Thread ccandide
On 21 mai, 01:39, Minh Nguyen wrote: > You don't need to run as root or using sudo. Try > > ./sage > > in the Sage root directory. I still get the same error message. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To u

[sage-support] Unable to install Sage

2009-05-20 Thread ccandide
I try to install Sage on my computer by means of the pre-compiled binaries : i downloaded the the tar.gz file from http://www.sagemath.fr/linux/32bit/ for the 32 bits Ubuntu distribution and then I ran the sage script file within a shell and i got the following : cand...@candide-desktop:~/sage-