dim...@gmail.com schrieb am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2023 um 20:50:29 UTC+1:
Basically, the default B1 value is too large in this case.
sage: ecm.factor(71281426948143699070565,B1=200) # almost instant
[5, 53, 337, 1873, 2833, 7507, 20037791]
sage: ecm.factor(71281426948143699070565,B1=2000) # ta
Hi,
I have a hard time factoring the number 71281426948143699070565 using
ecm.factor(). No result is given after a few minutes runtime. Though,
plain factor() happily factors the number. Factoring smaller or larger
numbers work fine with ecm.factor(), too. Just the single given number
see
billion?
I can get the discrete log in the circle group for prime powers like this:
sage: F. = FiniteField(23^2, modulus=x^2 + 1)
sage: F. = FiniteField(23^2, modulus=x^2 + 1)
sage: aliceSecret = (1 + a)^13
sage: sage: aliceSecret.log(1 + a)
13
Thanks,
Bill
--
You received this message because you
t; Go to https://cloud.sagemath.com/help and click on the link "support
> mailing list", which links to
>
>https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/sage-cloud
>
> That said, I'm cc'ing Bill Hart, since he uses Julia a lot and has
> used iJulia. I d
Python bug-tracker issue.
Maybe I'll just try that and report back.
Bill
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://grou
On Nov 16, 8:14 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2011, Bill Janssen
> wrote:
>
> > Could I really be the first user in this vast assemblage to have an
> > NFS-mounted home directory?
>
> No, many people do, eg all users of the sage.math devel clust
On Nov 15, 2:34 pm, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
> Ah, then this issue will hopefully be fixed with changing the python in
> sage to 2.7.
What's the ETA on that? Is there a patch I could apply in the
meantime?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
Could I really be the first user in this vast assemblage to have an
NFS-mounted home directory?
I tried building and installing sage with a local account, then just
using it from my network account (which is the account I generally
use). Here's the error from *that*:
/tilde/janssen 34 % /local/s
This is a Python bug. Fixed in late March 2010.
http://bugs.python.org/issue7512
On Nov 14, 4:56 pm, Bill Janssen wrote:
> "make test" fails as well. This is Sage 4.7.2 on OS X 10.5.
>
> Bill
>
> On Nov 14, 4:44 pm, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
&
"make test" fails as well. This is Sage 4.7.2 on OS X 10.5.
Bill
On Nov 14, 4:44 pm, Bill Janssen wrote:
> I just tried building Sage from source on a PARC machine. On this
> machine, my home directory is an NFS-mounted share. The build fails
> with a shower of me
I see that in John's formulation, there's also a space for a "magic
number" for the file. Maybe that could be used to switch between
bunzip2 and tar, versus just tar.
On Nov 12, 6:20 pm, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 11/12/2011 08:47 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
> &g
I just tried building Sage from source on a PARC machine. On this
machine, my home directory is an NFS-mounted share. The build fails
with a shower of messages of this form:
Build finished. The built documents can be found in /local/sage-4.7.2/
devel/sage/doc/output/html/en/numerical_sage
Trace
Thanks for the pointer. Looks like lots of good folk are already
working on it.
Bill
On Nov 14, 10:23 am, William Stein wrote:
> On 11/14/11 10:18 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > This is because I run Privoxy on my machine as an HTTP proxy, *and*
>
might consider incorporating the patch at http://bugs.python.org/issue8883
in the python-2.6.4 spkg.
On Nov 14, 10:18 am, Bill Janssen wrote:
> This is because I run Privoxy on my machine as an HTTP proxy, *and*
> specify proxy exceptions. If I turn off the proxying entirely (in
> Syst
Yes, the user (me) has write permission.
On Nov 14, 10:16 am, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Monday, November 14, 2011 10:05:44 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
>
> > Does the user doing "sage -optional" have write permission to the
> > directory /local/sage-4.7.2/tmp/ ?
>
> > I just opened a ticket for thi
ing the version of Python used with Sage would be a major
undertaking...
On Nov 14, 9:34 am, Bill Janssen wrote:
> % sage -python -c "import urllib; print
> urllib.urlretrieve('http://www.sagemath.org//packages')"
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File &qu
", line 1379, in
proxy_bypass_macosx_sysconf
mask = int(m.group(2)[1:])
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is unsubscriptable
% /usr/bin/python -c "import urllib; print urllib.urlretrieve('http://
www.sagemath.org//packages')"
('/var/folders/Rg/Rg1suhnjFdSFgRrn7ZA-jk+++TM
Maybe this is because I built the install under /tmp, then moved it
to /local afterwards?
More likely, your machine is configured in some way that allows this,
and mine is not.
On Nov 14, 9:22 am, William Stein wrote:
> On 11/14/11 9:02 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
he options that actually work on OS X, as
well as other platforms, are somewhat limited.
There's probably room to expand the pil test suite, too. Where would
I find that code?
On Nov 14, 8:22 am, kcrisman wrote:
> Bill, your expertise would clearly be really helpful
> onhttp://trac.s
it has to work with at compile time, not run
time.
Bill
On Nov 13, 5:23 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
> > Ah, I see. Yes, libjpeg is built from source on the build machines,
> > but only temporarily. It could be "instal
I'm using Sage 4.7.2, built from source, on OS X 10.5 Leopard. When I
try to list the experimental packages, or install one of them, I get
the following traceback:
% sage -optional
Using SAGE Server http://www.sagemath.org//packages
http://www.sagemath.org//packages/optional/list --> /local/sage-
Is there any particular reason this isn't part of sage.el already?
On Nov 12, 6:20 pm, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 11/12/2011 08:47 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
> > You can visit a .tar.bz2 file with GNU Emacs 23, and it works. If I
> > rename the .spkg file to .tar.bz2,
On Nov 13, 1:23 pm, Bill Janssen wrote:
> This means that any system
> program (like Preview.app, which Imaging-1.1.7 uses for im.show()),
> will fail if started from inside Sage, as the newer Sage-supplied
> dylibs will be different from the (usually obsolete) versions the
> s
ot familiar yet with the spkg infrastructure, so perhaps it's
impossible to fit a step like this into the Sage build process.
On Nov 13, 1:31 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
> > My suggestion doesn't require binary build machines
are dynamically linked against. Unless the image
processing libraries are statically linked where needed in Sage, in
which case it works fine.
On Nov 13, 12:58 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
> > What's the objection to linking PIL st
What's the objection to linking PIL statically against libjpeg? It
would remove a lot of uncertainty in the build. PIL seems to be the
only place libjpeg is used.
On Nov 13, 12:44 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
> > Yes, I thin
n Nov 12, 2:58 pm, Bill Janssen wrote:
> I'm still trying to sort out the image processing capabilities of
> Sage. One of the things my download of 4.7 has is PIL 1.1.6, which
> seems to have a broken Image.fromarray method. For instance,
>
> Image.fromarray(scipy.lena()).sh
DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH for this purpose?
Bill
On Nov 13, 11:50 am, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2011, at 09:59 , Bill Janssen wrote:
>
> > You're implying that 4.7.1 or 4.7.2 fix this issue in some way? I
> > don't see anything in the release
You're implying that 4.7.1 or 4.7.2 fix this issue in some way? I
don't see anything in the release notes which would cause me to
suspect that.
Bill
On Nov 12, 6:52 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> On Nov 12, 6:43 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
>
> > On Nov 11, 201
Looks good, John, thanks.
Bill
On Nov 12, 6:08 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Saturday, November 12, 2011 5:47:38 PM UTC-8, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
> > You can visit a .tar.bz2 file with GNU Emacs 23, and it works. If I
> > rename the .spkg file to .tar.bz2, it works. But
Oh, sure, I could build from source. But I'd rather see the binary
distribution fixed.
On Nov 12, 3:43 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 13:27 , Bill Janssen wrote:
>
> > I've downloaded and installed sage on my OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Mac Pro.
You can visit a .tar.bz2 file with GNU Emacs 23, and it works. If I
rename the .spkg file to .tar.bz2, it works. But I don't see how to
tell Emacs that .spkg == .tar.bz2...
Bill
On Nov 12, 3:45 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2011, at 15:34 , Bill Janssen wrote:
&
As spkg files are simply tar files, possibly compressed, it would be
nice to use the tar-mode in Emacs to visit them. Any way to do that?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
I'm still trying to sort out the image processing capabilities of
Sage. One of the things my download of 4.7 has is PIL 1.1.6, which
seems to have a broken Image.fromarray method. For instance,
Image.fromarray(scipy.lena()).show()
gives a very odd-looking cubist interpretation of lena, indeed.
That 7344 is quite a complicated ticket.
I fixed my immediate problem by creating /opt/local/, downloading
jpegsrc.v8c.tar, configuring it, building it, and installing it where
Sage expects to find it. Thousands wouldn't have :-).
Bill
On Nov 11, 7:31 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> On Nov 11,
with UpLib.
Bill
On Nov 12, 10:53 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Daniel Dvorkin
>
> wrote:
> > On Nov 11, 2:27 pm, Bill Janssen wrote:
> >> It seems to me that if you're going to depend on a library that's
> >> installed
reate /opt/local/lib) you should instead package it with and in the
Sage tree.
Bill
/local/sage-4.7 57 % ./sage
--
| Sage Version 4.7, Release Date: 2011-05-23 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and licen
Ubuntu 11.04? Could the same fix be
expanded so that compiling would succeed on Mint as well?
Bill Odefey
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this
Changing the permissions in the /usr/local/ path so that all users
could write seems to have straightened out the build problem.
I sudo chmod'ed +w's and then after the build, returned the
permissions to 755's.
On Nov 11, 10:30 pm, bill wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> Ste
displays: Sage version 4.6 ...
Step 5: continues "The Sage install tree may have moved
(from /scratch/wstein/build/sage-4.6 to /home/bill/sage-4.6-
linux-64...)
Changing various hadcoded paths
(please wait at most a few minutes)
Do not interrupt this.
Done resetting paths ( ;;; many minutes
When I run
g4=Graph({'H':['G','L','L','D'],'L':['G','D']})
g4.eulerian_circuit()
I get the error message
Traceback (click to the left of this block for traceback)
...
RuntimeError: Vertex (L) not in the graph.
This seems to be an error in the routine.
--
To post to this group, send email to
On 19 Aug, 18:52, kcrisman wrote:
> > I wonder if there is a reason for this. Do the additions break the
> > lexeme or is there a syntactic ambiguity...
>
> William or Mike H. would know for sure, but I believe the additions
> are all invalid Python which happen to be convenient mathematics :)
On 19 Aug, 18:19, kcrisman wrote:
> On Aug 19, 12:48 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if that is what he means. He is using Sage to load
> > the .py file, not python.
>
> Exactly. Sage interprets .py files as pure Python, I believe. But it
> turns .sage
ble.
Anyhow, I wasn't able to help him with his question. Apparently
importing all these things didn't help unless he is doing
something else wrong.
Bill.
On 19 Aug, 17:00, kcrisman wrote:
> Dear Andrew,
>
> It turns out that
>
> R.=PolynomialRing(GF(5),2,"z
found, in future.
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart :
> Hi all,
>
> it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
> It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
>
> Please note the following important things:
>
> * I have been unable to get any tes
all
users of t2 globally, I believe MPIR will work just fine on that
machine.
Bill.
2010/1/29 Bill Hart :
> OK, the problem is as follows. For very straightforward C programs, no
> problems occur on t2 because the compiler emits inline code for
> everything. However, once the program bec
test case that exhibits this failure
would be difficult.
I've no idea what the solution to the problem is. Back to the sparc
expert for this one!
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart :
> One sensible solution would seem to be to set
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=/usr/local/gcc-4.4.1-sun-linker/lib/spar
it
doesn't matter whether at the beginning or end) and this fixes the
problems on t2. Shouldn't this be done globally for all users?
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart :
> 2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby :
>> Bill Hart wrote:
>>>
>>> 2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby :
>>>>
&
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby :
> Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> 2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby :
>>>
>>> The problem is that 64-bit libraries should never be in /usr/local/lib.
>>> Instead they should be in /usr/local/lib/sparcv9.
>>
>> I am not installing M
could easily turn out to be wrong about this.
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart :
> On t2 all the tests fail, complaining of the same issue. If I actually
> go into the tests directory and run one of the test scripts directly,
> here is what it does:
>
> ./t-modlinv
> ld.so.1: t-modlinv: fa
As far as I know that is only necessary on OS X. Anyhow, I tried it
just in case, and no change.
Thanks for the suggestion though.
Bill.
2010/1/28 Craig Citro :
>> So it can't find libmpir.so.8. But I don't see why.
>>
>> echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>> /usr/lib/spa
I forgot to mention, the long deprecated function mpz_random has also
finally been removed.
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart :
> Hi all,
>
> it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
> It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
>
> Please note the f
hart/mpir-1.3.0/.libs
But:
wbh...@t2:~/mpir-1.3.0/tests$ ls ../.libs
compat.o libmpir.so.8 randbui.o rands.o
dummy.o libmpir.so.8.0.0 randclr.o randsd.o
....
So it's there.
Do sparc machines just ignore LD_LIBRARY_PATH or something?
Bill.
So on t2 there is no /usr/local/lib/sparcv9, so that's a bit useless!
Does this mean t2 is not capable of running 64 bit binaries?
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby :
> Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby :
> Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
>> It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
>>
>> Please note the following important things:
>>
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby :
> Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
>> It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
>>
>> Please note the following important things:
>>
have to wait a couple of days until I issue
an update to FLINT, in particular the quadratic sieve, which still
uses the old functions - in the mean time, just add the above defines
to flint.h).
Bill.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this gr
As reported here in other threads it seems that jmol-based 3-graphics
fails in FireFox under Windows XP. I am not sure if it is all
configurations anv versions or only some but I do have one laptop
running Windows XP and the most recent version of FireFox and this
still fails with the newest versio
ndows Internet Explorer works fine on both systems.
Regards,
Bill Page.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 8:52 AM, docfleetwood wrote:
>
> You are not alone in this problem. I and others have this problem
> also and I have not seen a solution posted here even though several
> have complained about
Ah, OK, thanks for clearing that up.
Bill.
On Aug 17, 7:04 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> > It's ubuntu and we can open the port as we have root access (assuming
> > John is talking about the same machine - which I a
re at all interested, please let me
know.
In any case, XPOLY might serve as a starting point for something
similar in Sage.
Regards,
Bill Page.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Nicholas
Jackson wrote:
>
> I'm trying to use SnapPy [1] to calculate Alexander polynomials of knot
> comple
this is part of the problem. Naturally I
changed all the relevant paths in the instructions to
/storage/sage_chroot.image.
Can anyone help?
Bill.
On Aug 17, 8:40 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> > Actually, I probably spoke out of
It's ubuntu and we can open the port as we have root access (assuming
John is talking about the same machine - which I am pretty sure he
is).
How secure is the notebook server these days. Is it still advised to
set it up in a chroot jail (see my other post about problems I had
doing that).
of days to be able to be in a
position to do that.
Regards,
Bill Page.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:43 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Martin
> Rubey wrote:
>>
>> If you are running longer jobs with fricas, you should consider
>> switching t
I will let the current test run to completion (if possible) and let
you know the result. If this succeeds, I will try building a new
version of Sage and FriCAS that is closer to what you are running and
try again to see if I am able to reproduce the problem.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-
> [ x ] No, I can read the above just fine. It is crystal clear.
... but of course unnecessarily verbose. In my opinion a more common
notation in Sage:
sage: x=2*vector(range(10))+vector(10*[3])
sage: list_plot(map(lambda a:[cos(a),sin(a)],x/max(x)))
is superior to Mathematica.
On Tue, Jul 14
> [ x ] No, I can read the above just fine. It is crystal clear.
... but of course unnecessarily verbose. In my opinion a more common
notation in Sage:
sage: x=2*vector(range(10))+vector(10*[3])
sage: list_plot(map(lambda a:[cos(a),sin(a)],x/max(x)))
is superior to Mathematica.
On Tue, Jul 14
] ]
sage: Q=lambda d,x,y:P(d,x,y).subs_expr(solve(E(d),V(d),solution_dict=True)[0])
sage: Q(1,x,y)
0
sage: Q(2,x,y)
0
sage: Q(3,x,y)
0
sage: Q(4,x,y).factor()
r21*(-y^2 + x*y + x^2 - 1)*(-y^2 + x*y + x^2 + 1)
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to thi
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Bill Page wrote:
>> Ok thanks. I recall the discussion and I can indeed write:
>>
>> sage: f=lambda x:RR(x).nth_root(3)
>> sage: f(-2.0)
>> -1.25992104989487
>>
>> but I think I'll let m
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Bill Page wrote:
>>
>> Consider the problem to define
>>
>> f(x) = x^(1/3)
>>
>> so that it takes the real branch for x < 0. The best I have been able
>> to come up with so far
).sign()*x)^(1/3)
sage: plot(f,(-2,2))
I think there should be a more obvious way.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@g
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Bill Page wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>
>>> This is because the branch in which the positive real root is real is
>>&
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> This is because the branch in which the positive real root is real is
> taken. We're opting for continuity and consistency with complex numbers.
>
If I wrote:
sage: ComplexField(53)(-2.0)^(1/3)
0.629960524947437 + 1.09112363597172*I
t
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bill Page wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Bill Page wrote:
>>>>
>>>
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Bill Page wrote:
>>
>> Can someone explain this apparently inconsistent result?
>
> It's just operator precedence:
>
> sage: -(2.0^(1/3))
> -1.25992104989487
&g
Can someone explain this apparently inconsistent result?
--
| Sage Version 3.4, Release Date: 2009-03-11 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
---
later version of Python in the Debian 4 system, should I rebuild
sage, or does it matter?
Thanks.
-- Bill
Excerpt from test.log (129 lines):
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sag
ason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill wrote:
> > Hello,
> > given a matrix over CDF I would like to obtain its real and imaginary
> > parts.
> > I know how to write my own function to do this, but I was wondering if
> > there is one built-in. Couldn't
Hello,
given a matrix over CDF I would like to obtain its real and imaginary
parts.
I know how to write my own function to do this, but I was wondering if
there is one built-in. Couldn't see anything in the docs.
Many thanks,
Bill (using SAGE version
uedFraction is at
> http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/ContinuedFraction.html
>
> Carl
>
Thanks, Carl.
Bill
--
+---+
| Bill Purvis, Web Designer
it could be the number of recurring terms. Given the way
> > > that Python handles negative indices I guess the second option could
> > > amount to the same thing by making it negative. Again, feedback
> > > welcomed.
> > >
> > > Bill
> >
> > Hmm
demands on my time, so don't
expect anything this week! ;-)
Bill
--
+---+
| Bill Purvis, Amateur Mathematician|
| email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
+---+
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
7;m guessing
> it not too much trouble, for example, to modify version() to return a
> pair - the version
> and the name of the clone branch one is in. I'd be happy to prepare
> a patch if I could get a hint on how to get started.
> - D
e is called "Text"; if
> you press that, you get a plain text version of your worksheet,
> which you can then copy/paste/etc.
>
> Best,
> Alex
Many thanks,
that's another new thing I learned today!
Bill
--
+---+
| Bill Purvis, Amateu
On Saturday 16 February 2008, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2:07 am, bill purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wanted to make a plot of x^3+y^3=1729 (the well-known taxicab problem).
> > I'm sure there are better ways of acieving this but I opted for a naive
> &g
t;
> You are defining f twice, first as a function then as a graphics
> object. You need to pick a different name for one or the other.
>
> Carl
>
Must be old age creeping on! Many thanks for spotting that.
Bill
--
+---+
| Bill Purvis, Amateur Mat
recall having any difficulty,
apart from remembering to press the shift key each time until I got used
to it.
Just checked the Tutorial and there is a very brief mention of Shift-Enter
on the last line, where it talks about hitting Esc for help. Tried the Help
again and it's fairly obvious in
#x27;?
Just did a check on the HTML source and it's on line 196.
(This the online html from www.sagemath.org)
Bill
--
+---+
| Bill Purvis, Amateur Mathematician|
| email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing something totally stupid or is there a bug here?
Bill
(still running 2.10.1.rc3 on Linux, Ubuntu 7.10 on a Toshiba Equium laptop)
--
+---+
| Bill Purvis, Amateur Mathematician|
| email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://bil.mem
These
> possibilities are documented at
>
> http://www.math.union.edu/locate/jsMath/authors/warnings.html
>
> so the sage project could set up the messages in a different way if it
> wants to.
>
> Davide
Davide, see my earlier message to William.
Apologi
On Friday 25 January 2008, William Stein wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 4:49 AM, bill purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 25 January 2008, Timothy Clemans wrote:
> > > See http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsmath/download/jsMath-fonts.html.
> > > There are in
On Friday 25 January 2008, William Stein wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 4:49 AM, bill purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 25 January 2008, Timothy Clemans wrote:
> > > See http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsmath/download/jsMath-fonts.html.
> > > There are in
On Friday 25 January 2008, Timothy Clemans wrote:
> See http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsmath/download/jsMath-fonts.html.
> There are install instructions for PC, Mac OS X, and Unix users.
>
> On Jan 24, 11:45 pm, bill purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, but what about Sag
otebook server expects to find them.
I thought they were included as part of the Sage distribution, anyway?
Bill
--
+---+
| Bill Purvis, Amateur Mathematician|
| email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://bil.members.beeb.net |
+---
ented
a little or there was some mark in the margin it would be clearer.
I hadn't seen the option to click in the left of the output area,
except when an error occurs and it explicitly suggests that to get
a trace-back.
Thanks for the info.
Bill
--
+--
my Firefox browser. For instance, in the
head of a page server1.py seems to put SAGE: %s
while on my browser I see %s (SAGE).
Am I looking in the right place? What I want to do is turn on some
kind of logging to see what requests the server is receiving and
what it send in re
On Saturday 19 January 2008, William Stein wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 7:39 AM, mabshoff
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 19, 12:06 pm, bill purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 19 January 2008, mabshoff wrote:> Hello folks,
>
sk:
Is it safe to assume that 2.10 is essentially the same as 2.10.alpha4?
If not can I simply apply a few fixes to save the effort of downloading,
compiling and testing everything?
Bill
--
+---+
| Bill Purvis, Amateur Mathematician|
|
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 7:38 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 18, 2008 10:00 PM, Georg Grafendorfer
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Michael,
> > > OK, i'm already a bit confused, and i don't know any more what your
> > > r
d like to second that.
I don't think I'll be able to participate in this doc day due to the
time difference (I think PST is 8 hours behind GMT).
Also, I've never used IRC before so it will be a learning exercise
if I do get to join in.
Bill
--
+---+
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
