out theorem.
> No guarantee that any solution is real, though.
>
>
>
> So you can not expect a solution by quadrature. You must try to solve
> you system numerically.
> >
> >
> > - Mail d’origine -
> > De: Scott Wilson
> > À: sage-support
&
Hello, I am new to sage math and tried to get the solution to the following
nonlinear equation system. Sage has been working on this since yesterday
and I am wondering how long I should typically wait. All comments are
appreciated. Thanks in advance.
var('A B E F I J R T')
eq1 = A*E-B^2-B*F+E^
mology calculations...)
Is it possible to restore that URL, or provide a redirect to the new home
of the content (if there is one)?
(Also, if I should report this somewhere else, please let me know. It's not
obvious. :-)
best regards,
Scott Morrison
--
You received this message because you are
doh!! ok I'm an idiot! My apologies for wasting your time.
scott
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 5:58:22 AM UTC-5, David Joyner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Scott Richardson > wrote:
> > Hello, I was doing the spring mass example, by copy and paste, in this
> it would take to fix it.
>
> What kind of sage object are we talking about?
>
>
> On Sunday, 21 December 2014 17:01:47 UTC-5, Shane Scott wrote:
>>
>> Am I correct in thinking the sage-mathematica interface is still broken?
>> If that's the case is ther
Am I correct in thinking the sage-mathematica interface is still broken? If
that's the case is there a way to save sobj objects and import them
manually into Mathematica? What options for porting data are there?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage
by exterior algebras on n variables, say
E[Q] by sending
Q(x) = 1
Q(y) = x^8
but I would like this to be a derivation, i.e., has a product rule :
Q(x*y) = Q(x)*y + x*Q(y).
How would I do this?
I appreciate any help that could be offered.
-Scott
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-su
pm, kcrisman wrote:
> On Oct 15, 8:31 pm, Scott wrote:
>
>
>
> > What I really want is sage to give me the answer as:
> > q1 = 0.58239...(however many digits)*q2
>
> > Is there a way to do that? I don't want an approximate value of the
> > entire thing (
pm, kcrisman wrote:
> On Oct 15, 8:31 pm, Scott wrote:
>
>
>
> > What I really want is sage to give me the answer as:
> > q1 = 0.58239...(however many digits)*q2
>
> > Is there a way to do that? I don't want an approximate value of the
> > entire thing (
pm, kcrisman wrote:
> On Oct 15, 8:31 pm, Scott wrote:
>
>
>
> > What I really want is sage to give me the answer as:
> > q1 = 0.58239...(however many digits)*q2
>
> > Is there a way to do that? I don't want an approximate value of the
> > entire thing (
pm, kcrisman wrote:
> On Oct 15, 8:31 pm, Scott wrote:
>
>
>
> > What I really want is sage to give me the answer as:
> > q1 = 0.58239...(however many digits)*q2
>
> > Is there a way to do that? I don't want an approximate value of the
> > entire thing (
416000)*q2
What I want:
q1 = 0.58239...*q2
On Oct 15, 5:16 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> Dear Scott,
>
> Thanks for posting.
>
> On Oct 15, 6:46 pm, Scott wrote:
>
>
>
> > I know this is really basic, but for some reason I cannot figure this
> > out and my searching (he
d result (since I use q2=1).
I've tried many other combinations of sol_q1.n(), sol_q1[0].n(), etc,
etc, etc...but they all give me errors. As a note:
sol_q1 is a Sequence (list of the answers)
sol_q1[0] is a SymbolicEquation
Thanks for the help,
Scott
PS: I tried using the for loop a littl
install xorg-proto linux-headers
Ranlib, gcc, m4 and make were not in the default installation of
Pardus 2009 Beta
sudo pisi install binutils gcc m4 make
Sage took about 3 hours to build.
V/R
Scott
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage
The package xorg-proto is also required to provide the X11 headers.
On Jun 23, 9:41 am, Scott wrote:
> The installation of the linux-headers package with pisi under Pardus
> Linux 2009Beta solved the above problem.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
The installation of the linux-headers package with pisi under Pardus
Linux 2009Beta solved the above problem.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubs
,
Scott
On Jun 22, 4:35 pm, William Stein wrote:
> e
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Scott wrote:
>
> > I am unable to build sage from source on underPardus2009B and could
> > not find any obvious flags to try.
>
> What isPardus.
>
> The error you g
I am unable to build sage from source on under Pardus 2009B and could
not find any obvious flags to try.
V/R
Scott
gcc, g++, make, m4, perl, ranlib, tar. gas/as, gld/ld, gnm/nm, gas/
as, gld/ld, gnm/nm are all installed.
The standard output for the error is:
bzip2-1.0.5/
manual.xml
bzip2
Can the sage contained ipython -pylab in the sage tree be made to
print interactively like ipython -pylab in /usr/bin. I am running
ubuntu 8.1 on a amd_64 turion processor.
By interactive I mean that entering plot([1,2]) make a figure pop up.
V/R
Scott A
Hello,
Is there a reason why I cannot do
f(x)=abs(x)
f(vector([1,2,3]))
Many related things work fine:
abs(vector([1,2,3])) # works
def f(x): return abs(x)
f(vector([1,2,3])) # works
Session below shows the trouble.
Thanks,
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sage
,
Scott
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http
e x_dot is a derivative and not a symbol
Where in the documentation is this method covered?
Thanks
Scott
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
22 matches
Mail list logo
