Re: [sage-support] Re: Multiple ideal membership

2011-03-27 Thread Robert Goss
On 27 March 2011 16:52, Martin Albrecht wrote: > AFAIK, there's no nice, Python-ic way to do this in Sage yet, since the > relevant functionality of Singular has not been properly wrapped yet. > > See > >   http://www.singular.uni-kl.de/Manual/3-1-2/sing_131.htm#SEC171 > > for Singular's module ca

[sage-support] Re: Multiple ideal membership

2011-03-27 Thread Robert Goss
Sorry for replying to myself what i am asking is there capacity in sage to replicate the magma code: >R := PolynomialRing(RationalField(), 3); >M := EModule(R, 2); >S := sub; >Groebner(S); >a := M ! [y+1, z]; >a in S; false >b := M ! [y+1, z+x]; >b in S; true On 27

[sage-support] Multiple ideal membership

2011-03-27 Thread Robert Goss
Hi, If I want to see if there exists polynomials a_1,...,a_n such that f = a_1*f_1 + ... + a_n*f_n where f,f_1,...,f_n are some polynomials I can just check if a is in the ideal generated by f_1,...,f_n. But suppose I want to see if there exists a_1,...a_n such that f = a_1*f_1 + ... + a_n*f_n

Re: [sage-support] Re: Intersection of complex Ideals

2011-03-01 Thread Robert Goss
> What kind of generators of ideals are you dealing with? For reference all the input generators are in QQ. Robert -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, vis

Re: [sage-support] Re: Intersection of complex Ideals

2011-03-01 Thread Robert Goss
> No, it is not an exact computation over the complex, they are gauss > rationals a+b*I where a and b are rationals. As far as I know there is > no exact complex field implementation that is good for working with > ideals. Ah yes that would make a lot of sense. I will go back to my problem and se

Re: [sage-support] Re: Intersection of complex Ideals

2011-03-01 Thread Robert Goss
Thank you very much for your advice. I was trying to work out if the problem lay with me sage or documentation. > Do not use ideals over CC. CC is an inexact ring, so most operations > will fail. Work instead over the rationals. > > R. = PolynomialRing(QQ,2) > > or if you need complex numbers, you

[sage-support] Intersection of complex Ideals

2011-02-28 Thread Robert Goss
oing something wrong? Would anyone suggest a better way of doing this computation? Thank you for any comments. Robert Goss -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options,

[sage-support] Fundamental Group

2010-11-10 Thread Robert Goss
Dear all, I am trying to compute the fundamental group of some simplicial complexes in sage. Is there a way of creating a group with a given set of generators and relations? Thank you, Robert Goss. University of Warwick -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To