I'd suggest to check if you have stuff in /usr/local that does not belong
there.
On Tuesday, August 20, 2024 at 8:40:01 AM UTC-7 Ben Salisbury wrote:
> Hi. I'm trying to build Sage from source (the develop branch) on an M2
> MBAir running Sonoma 14.5 and the build continues to fail at gmp. I
I would like to get feedback from Sage users on Windows who are familiar
with VS Code regarding a proposed installation procedure for the Sage
Installation Guide.
-
https://doc-pr-37534--sagemath.netlify.app/html/en/installation/#using-visual-studio-code-with-sagemath-dev-containers
--
You rec
cpdef write_mps(self, filename, int modern) noexcept:
> ^
>
>
> sage_numerical_backends_gurobi/gurobi_backend.pyx:1142:14: C method
> 'write_mps' not previously declared in definiti
Which Sage version; logs please.
On Tuesday, July 23, 2024 at 8:28:06 AM UTC-7 Ziyan He wrote:
> When I try to use pip install to install sage-numerical-backends-gurobi, I
> encounter the following error:
>
> Error compiling Cython file:
> ---
I agree, the problem is that currently we cannot distinguish typo'd doctest
tags from valid doctest tags that are not present.
Part of the solution: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35856
On Thursday, June 13, 2024 at 7:40:27 AM UTC-7 Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> Generalizing the problem of
You might be looking
for
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/tensor_free_modules/sage/tensor/modules/tensor_with_indices.html
On Tuesday, April 9, 2024 at 6:59:27 AM UTC-7 Anton Todorov wrote:
> Einsum: https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/generated/numpy.einsum.html
>
> It is a way to
Yes, this is documented
in
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/launching.html#setting-up-sagemath-as-a-jupyter-kernel-in-an-existing-jupyter-notebook-or-jupyterlab-installation
On Monday, April 8, 2024 at 11:16:45 AM UTC-7 Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> Setup : Sage 10.4.beta1 runnin
This one is fixed in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37646
On Wednesday, March 27, 2024 at 9:58:10 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> I've cut out the interesting part of the log.
> It's a linker error (IMHO the linking should be done with C++, not
> with C compiler, but that's probably OK
On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 at 7:00:07 AM UTC-8 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
I don't know about any automated way to check that the example notebooks
are up to date.
One can use "jupyter nbconvert --to notebook --execute" for this
https://nbconvert.readthedocs.io/en/latest/execute_api.html
--
By the way, a further improvement to this section in the installation guide
is waiting for review in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37056
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 10:13:08 AM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> Many of these packages appeared in the 10.2 developer's guide only
Many of these packages appeared in the 10.2 developer's guide only because
of a bug in the script that generates this list.
This is already fixed in the current beta;
see
https://deploy-livedoc--sagemath.netlify.app/html/en/installation/source#debian-ubuntu-package-installation
Nevertheless, t
The page
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/portability_testing.html#using-our-pre-built-docker-images-for-development-in-vs-code
has a link to a number of more container options
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 3:29:35 PM UTC-7 Beth Claire wrote:
> I saw the cocalc docker, and yeah, it's
Try "make -j list-broken-packages", which may give instructions how to fix
this
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 7:40:58 PM UTC-7 Jianping Pan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using *SageMath version 10.1.beta1*, and I have dot2tex and graphviz
> installed. I checked that following line produces a nice PDF
>::Domain_t::RandIter&, FFPACK::FFPACK_CHARPOLY_TAG, unsigned
long)
I expect this to be in ffpack, so I made sure that ffpack is indeed picked
up from the dedicated conda environment:
lsof -p 70202 | grep -i ffpack
python3.1 70202 matthias txt REG 1,15 1132624 5917685
/Users
library from something that is not in the dedicated conda environment.
On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 8:05:04 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> config.log please
>
> On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 3:16:25 PM UTC-7 Matthias Goerner wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I can't get s
config.log please
On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 3:16:25 PM UTC-7 Matthias Goerner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I can't get sage to work when installing it with conda on a new MacBook
> Pro with M2 chip and Ventura 13.3.
>
> I tried
> conda -n sage create sage=9.X python=3.Y
&
9.7 with python 3.10 seems to work on Ventura 13.3 on a M2.
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 3:16 PM Matthias Goerner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I can't get sage to work when installing it with conda on a new MacBook
> Pro with M2 chip and Ventura 13.3.
>
> I tried
> conda -n sage create
error below.
Cheers,
Matthias
(sage-py310) matthias@matthiass-air-2 ~ % sage
┌┐
│ SageMath version 9.8, Release Date: 2023-02-11 │
│ Using Python 3.10.11. Type "help()
Try if "make sage_conf" fixes this problem.
If this persists, please post the file "config.log".
On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 3:19:13 PM UTC-7 Eric Majzoub wrote:
> Thank you, this allows sage to complete the build. However, now I have
> another problem. When I run sage from its install directo
On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 13:06:25 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 10:18:23 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
[...] leads me to believe that it's probably nor possible to install
pynormaliz via
On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 10:18:23 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
[...] leads me to believe that it's probably nor possible to install
pynormaliz via "make" in a binary distribution.
If you install Sage from a binary distribution, then there is no relation
whatsoever to a source tree of Sage.
On Monday, March 27, 2023 at 6:34:50 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
In my experience, sagelib needs rebuilding to interface with normaliz (I
think it's "make normaliz pynormaliz" nowadays, or perhaps one needs a pip
install).
No, there is no such build-time dependency. And "make pynormaliz" suffic
This screenshot is from the "_prereq" spkg, which records the minimal
packages for a from-source build of Sage.
Sage can be built using just the Xcode command-line tools, which is why
nothing is displayed there.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 3:38:12 AM UTC-7 Rishitha Madhavaram wrote:
> [image:
The way forward is via CVXpy.
See https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35120 (needs review); next
step: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/31962
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 2:15:00 AM UTC-8 Peter Mueller wrote:
> Even though I installed the optional packages csdp and dsdp in Sage 9.8,
Disable Anaconda and read what "./configure" says at the end (these
messages are for you)
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 2:07:52 PM UTC-8 hyunjo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to build Sage 9.8 from source for development; I had
> previously done so months ago, but I had not
I see the following error in sagelib-*.log:
#define LOCAL_HIREMAINDER register ulong hiremainder
^
sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.cpp:35068:120:
error: use of undeclared identifier 'pTakeOutComp1'; did you mean
'pTakeOutComp'?
but this is quite
>> error-prone.
>>
>> Please use conda, or build from source, or use Linux distro with much
>> more up to date Sage, e.g.
>> archlinux or Gentoo.
>>
>>
>> HTH
>> Dima
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 14
Report Ubuntu packaging bugs to Ubuntu
On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 10:17:31 PM UTC-7 kun.j...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to run sage on WSL2 (Ubuntu focal 20.04.5 LTS), and after a
> fresh install (sadly only version 9.0), running `sage` gives the following
> error.
>
> Mo
On Monday, September 5, 2022 at 1:09:59 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 4:06 AM Nils Bruin wrote:
> > On Sunday, 4 September 2022 at 10:31:42 UTC-7 george...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> >> I am about to submit a math paper to a journal. I would like to include
> a proper ci
>From the crash report:
ImportError: libflint-2.8.5.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
Likely, a system update (apt-get upgrade) removed this version of the
shared library.
Rebuild Sage from scratch.
See also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34203
On Monday, July 25
That's https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33981
On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 7:13:35 AM UTC-7 maksm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm building latte-distro on ubuntu 22.04 (windows 10 dual boot, Ryzen 7
> 5700h) for apt-installed sage 9.5 . ./configure executes properly but then
> for make ch
This looks like https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31403
On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 6:20:11 AM UTC-7 maksm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on Ubuntu 22.04, dual booted to Windows 10 on separate
> partition. The linux build is currently entirely fresh, after reinstalling,
> there's
I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34098 for this
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 2:58:26 PM UTC-7 list...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> When building SageMath on macOS from source, I think it is important to
> stress that
> $ source .homebrew-build-env
> must be done before
> $ ./configure
> (I h
>From config.log:
configure:7443: checking for pkg-config
configure:7466: found /mnt/c/Strawberry/perl/bin/pkg-config
configure:7478: result: /mnt/c/Strawberry/perl/bin/pkg-config
It's picking up pkg-config from your Windows install. Remote
/mnt/c/Strawberry/perl/bin/ from your PATH, and/or i
An online event on open-source mathematical software
with the SageMath user and developer community
https://wiki.sagemath.org/days112.358
50 hours around the world
Register today
It's free
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsub
Report Fedora packaging bugs to Fedora.
On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 1:14:00 PM UTC-7 marks...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I recently installed SageMath on my Fedora machine using dnf install
> sagemath.
> The install went fine and I can use the sage interactive shell just fine.
> To
Report Fedora packaging bugs to Fedora
On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 3:23:15 AM UTC-7 jacovant...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am running Fedora 36 (had the same issue in Fedora 35) on a Lenovo
> IdeaPad. After installing sage using dnf I tried running it but it failed
> due to: "ImportError: cannot lo
I have a fix in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33587, please test
On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 2:49:04 AM UTC-7 list...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thanks Matthias.
>
> This is on the latest develop branch.
>
> I have added a comment to the ticket you mention.
>
> Guillermo
Which version of Sage is this?
We fixed a bug like this recently that showed up when the environment
variable MAKE was set in a particular way.
See also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33587
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 3:17:08 AM UTC-7 list...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thanks, Maxime.
>
> Here is w
On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 12:39:23 AM UTC-7 Jean-Florent Raymond wrote:
> In order to test something I would like to remove from my sage install a
> python package that I installed (and updated) some time ago.
>
> First question:
> How can I remove a package installed with "sage -i"? I found
thing suspicious, for what that's worth.
>
> On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 2:34:56 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>> It would be worth checking whether "./sage -pip install -U pythran" or
>> "./sage -pip install -U git+https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/
It would be worth checking whether "./sage -pip install -U pythran" or
"./sage -pip install -U git+https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/pythran";
fixes this issue
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 2:01:49 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote:
> Since upgrading to OS X 12.3 a few days ago, along with the
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33440 fixes the problem and is waiting for
review.
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 11:07:50 AM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> The particular error that you are running into comes from Singular not
> being in PATH.
>
> Use "sage -sh" to
The particular error that you are running into comes from Singular not
being in PATH.
Use "sage -sh" to enter a shell in which SAGE_LOCAL/bin has been added to
PATH.
Then you can activate the venv as you did before.
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 10:45:00 AM UTC-8 m.derick...@gmail.com wrote:
lly?
> For example in sage.all we could do: "from numpy import mean, median". It
> seems strange to not have a top-level "mean" or "median" function, given
> all of the other esoteric top-level functions.
>
>
> On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 10:2
+1 on adding info on how to install Linux distributions with up-to-date
binary packages of Sage to our installation guide.
See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31485
(The updated installation guide, preview at
https://6212659123a9467b3cb0cd07--sagemath-tobias.netlify.app/installation/index.html
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 10:52:19 AM UTC-8 mat...@gmail.com wrote:
> Will Calculus be deprecated too?
>
See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32260 for the next deprecation
proposal.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To un
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 8:32:39 PM UTC-8 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
> Also, if you want to argue that users should explicitly import
> everything...
No, that's not what I'm arguing.
The deprecation of the basic_stats module happened because Sage has nothing
to offer in this area;
it's a
If you consider numpy an obscure library, it may be that your syllabus
needs updating
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 10:52:19 AM UTC-8 mat...@gmail.com wrote:
> Mean, median and mode are now deprecated. E.g.:
>
> >median([1,2,3])
> 2 :1: DeprecationWarning: sage.stats.basic_stats.median is dep
finds
> the javascript file in some other path such as usr/local/jupyter and uses
> that file instead. Of course a self-contained app cannot rely on anything
> like that.
>
> - Marc
>
> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 6:59:24 PM UTC-6 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>>
1:23 PM UTC-6 Marc Culler wrote:
>>>
>>>> No. I was referring to
>>>> https://ipywidgets.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_install.html which
>>>> was Samuel's [more details here] link.
>>>>
>>>> Incidentally, following those instr
On Tuesday, February 1, 2022 at 3:28:48 PM UTC-8 Marc Culler wrote:
> Of course Sage's venv is not a true virtualenv as created by venv,
>
It is actually a true venv, unless no system python can be used and Sage
builds its own copy of python3.
--
You received this message because you are s
Marc, are you referring to these instructions?
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/launching.html#setting-up-sagemath-as-a-jupyter-kernel-in-an-existing-jupyter-notebook-or-jupyterlab-installation
On Tuesday, February 1, 2022 at 3:28:48 PM UTC-8 Marc Culler wrote:
> So is Sage followin
I now have repro steps that do not require SnapPy at all:
Rx = PolynomialRing(RationalField(), 'x')
R = PolynomialRing(Rx, 'y')
R('-y^2 + x^2 - x + 1').resultant(R('(2*x - 1)*y'))
On Saturday, January 29, 2022 at 11:19:38 PM UTC-8 Matthias Goerner
I am getting a crash when I am running
SnapPy's https://github.com/3-manifolds/SnapPy test suite against SageMath
with the stack trace below.
I created several different conda environments, all with python 3.9.9, on
Mac OS 11.5.2 x86_64 and it seems to be related to the (cy)pari version.
That i
"make sagelib-clean" will fix this
On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 12:18:02 PM UTC-8 Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
> A recent upgrade of Debian testing seems to have broken Sage, which does
> not find libgsl.so.25 Crash report attached.
>
> An attempt at make -b also fails (see attached install.
No, the 9.4 binaries have the same problem, as noted
in
https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.4#Availability_as_binaries_and_in_distributions
We have two tickets in the 9.5 development series that aim to fix this
problem:
- https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32424 (waiting for review)
- h
Report Ubuntu packaging bugs to Ubuntu.
On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 10:50:56 AM UTC-7 mob...@gmail.com wrote:
> I installed *"Sage"* on *Google Colab*
> https://askubuntu.com/a/1159008/1033768
>
> *via the command: *
>
> !sudo apt-get install build-essential m4 dpkg-dev
> !sudo apt-get
This is a known issue with the binary distributions for Sage 9.3 and 9.4.
See
https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.4#Availability_as_binaries_and_in_distributions
Install from source instead.
On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 8:01:00 AM UTC-7 GÖKHAN SOYDAN wrote:
> hello everybody,
> I
Instead of:
gamma=vector([t,t^2,t^3])
use:
gamma=vector([t,t^2,t^3]).function(t)
Alternatively, keep gamma as is and use gamma(t=x) instead of gamma(x).
On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 1:18:52 PM UTC-7 Federico Galetto wrote:
> Hello, I get a warning due to function-call syntax deprecation and
Installed the binary distribution? Known to fail with some processors
(https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32424).
Try installing from source instead.
On Sunday, September 5, 2021 at 8:22:16 AM UTC-7 Topaze wrote:
> Hello.
>
> A quick recapitulation of my historic :
>
> Debian 10 + Sagemath 9.2 : O
Thanks, I've noted this
in
https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.4#Availability_as_binaries_and_in_distributions
On Friday, September 3, 2021 at 3:02:47 AM UTC-7 Rolandb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running the file 'relocate-once.py', I got an error: directory 'python'
> not recognized.
> Changin
a system
> wide install?
>
> On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 4:22:10 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 12:55:46 PM UTC-7 hbetx9 wrote:
>>
>>> On my system, python2 and python3 is installed, but there is no generic
>>> pyt
On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 12:55:46 PM UTC-7 hbetx9 wrote:
> On my system, python2 and python3 is installed, but there is no generic
> python symlink. Does this need to be created for sage and if so should it
> be python3? In installed from tarball, so this is not an issue with the
> Ubuntu
I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32424 for this issue with Sage
9.4.
On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 8:15:02 PM UTC-7 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I release cocalc-docker ([1], [2]) a few days ago with sage-9.4, and had
> people reporting back "illegal instruction" issues. S
The update to this (and other IPython/Jupyter tickets) is
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31280 -- which needs help.
On Tuesday, July 27, 2021 at 8:13:29 AM UTC-7 David Lowry-Duda wrote:
> This comes from python-prompt-toolkit. See here:
> https://github.com/prompt-toolkit/python-prompt-too
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 at 7:41:16 PM UTC-7 bluf...@gmail.com wrote:
> Using dnf to install sagemath works on Fedora 34, but then /usr/bin/sage
> gives
> a weird error message.
>
Please report Fedora packaging bugs to Fedora.
> Compiling sage from sage-9.2.tar.gz does not work.
> Using
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 2:36:27 PM UTC-7 kcrisman wrote:
> Normaliz already supports half-open polyhedra, see section 3.12 ("open
>> facets") in the Normaliz manual
>> see https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/blob/master/doc/Normaliz.pdf
>>
>
> Thank you! But, based on the tickets I've jus
Normaliz already supports half-open polyhedra, see section 3.12 ("open
facets") in the Normaliz manual
see https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/blob/master/doc/Normaliz.pdf
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 1:26:01 PM UTC-7 kcrisman wrote:
> Thanks to the MUCH easier install now of things like pyn
We'd need to see the top-level config.log corresponding to a failing build.
On Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 3:37:42 PM UTC-7 Greg Marks wrote:
> > On a Debian 10 system, building sage-9.3 from source fails with this
> > error:
> >
> > ...
> > [dochtml] Traceback (most recent call last):
> > [doch
On Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 7:00:55 AM UTC-7 Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> Trying to list the installed optional packages, I innocently typed :
>
> charpent@zen-book-flip:~$ sage -optional | grep -v not_instal
>
> The answer left me stimyed :
>
> /usr/local/sage-9/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
/Sage/sage-9.2/build/make'
> >> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/net/dlp762/share/application-software/Sage/sage-9.2/build/make'
> >> Nothing to (re)build / all up-to-date.
> >> [lsf@dlp762 sage-9.2]$
> >>
> >> I include the config log.
&g
On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 4:08:34 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Matthias,
> is it another instance of not having .pc files ready for blas/lapack etc?
>
I don't think so. From Klaus' configure.log above,
===
Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG openblas...
ch
OK, time to officially remove support for building with python 2.6 as
sage-bootstrap-python - https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20023 (needs
review).
On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 10:25:35 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 6:18 PM Matthias Koeppe
> wrote:
> &g
Looks like we cannot bootstrap using Python 2.6 any more.
The error seen in the log
is:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19668395/str-format-for-python-2-6-gives-error-where-2-7-does-not
On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 9:53:28 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 5:08 PM
As Dima said, please report bugs of distribution packaging of Sage to the
distribution.
On Monday, February 1, 2021 at 8:29:17 AM UTC-8 tiger...@gmail.com wrote:
> I should also add this.
> If from an ipython module I invoke `from sage.misc.misc_c import prod`,
> everything works fine.
> On the
This failure on Cygwin has been fixed
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31146
On Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 10:29:41 AM UTC-8 user...@gmail.com wrote:
> While building Sage 9.2 from source, the `make` process throws an error
> while building the "fpylll.config" extension. I believe the mos
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 at 5:55:38 AM UTC-8 u...@ll.mit.edu wrote:
>
>>> the MacPorts-specific part would be to create a list of packages to
>> install, and put it into build/pkgs/*/distros/macports
>> and a similar global location.
>>
>
> I'm not sure I understand what that means.
>
Yo
On Monday, November 30, 2020 at 7:47:27 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> we should get opensuse tumbleweed properly supported, with CI.
>
> this entails listing the needed packages in build/pkgs/*/distros/
> like we do for Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.
>
>>
>>
Packages for opensuse are already up in
https
The actual error is likely further up. This problem could just be the
missing dependency of sagelib on giac, already fixed
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30858
Try compiling the latest development version,
or do "make giac && make" to work around the problem
On Saturday, November 28, 2020 a
Those who want to help with this problem may
find https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30619 useful -- builds on this system
can be reproduced using "tox -e docker-opensuse-tumbleweed-standard"
On Saturday, November 28, 2020 at 10:23:52 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> please post the top-level co
On Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 11:57:21 AM UTC-7, Carl Eberhart wrote:
>
> Thanks. After looking for the definition of of preparse_file it appears
> that it is imported from a binary file. Will I have to download the source
> and recompile to fix this?
>
Your code in orthogtraps19.sage like
On Monday, October 19, 2020 at 10:36:05 AM UTC-7, Carl Eberhart wrote:
>
> I can't load a sage file in either the notebook or terminal version of Sage
> File "", line 121
> if s<>_sage_const_0 :
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
The syntax <> for "not equal" is no longer valid in
de 12, macOS 11 Big Sur"
On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 8:19:37 AM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> With a system Python and "make -k", the following packages fail:
>
> gf2x
> ecm
> symmetrica
> rubiks
> ecl
> scipy
>
> On Tuesday, Septemb
2020 at 9:52:37 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 8:59:14 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>> If I do install Python 3.7, then gf2x and ecm both fail to build. The
>>> gf2x log file says "configure: error: Cannot find a
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 8:59:14 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> If I do install Python 3.7, then gf2x and ecm both fail to build. The gf2x
> log file says "configure: error: Cannot find a build system compiler
> ". The ecm log file says "checking if globals are prefixed by
> undersc
This fix was already merged in 3.8.4, so
after https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27754 we should be fine.
The PR for Python 3.7 is https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21155, but
our Python 3.7.x is very old already.
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 9:43:15 PM UTC-7, Matthias Koeppe wrote
The issue with "posixmodule" is apparently
https://bugs.python.org/issue41100
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 8:59:14 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> If I do install Python 3.7, then gf2x and ecm both fail to build. The gf2x
> log file says "configure: error: Cannot find a build system c
Problems with the Ubuntu packaging should be reported as an Ubuntu bug.
On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 11:31:57 PM UTC-7, Samuel Tang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your quick response. I am running on Ubuntu 20.04, and
> installed Sagemath via `sudo apt-get install sagemath`.
> From what I recorded
You could deactivate conda and try again.
On Tuesday, July 28, 2020 at 8:33:38 PM UTC-7, Luis Enriquez-Contreras
wrote:
>
> OS: Linux Mint 20
>
> SageMath: sage-9.1-Ubuntu_18.04-x86_64.tar.bz2
>
> Hello all, I am trying to install sage 9.1, but I get this error after the
> ./configure
> configu
This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30103
On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 7:42:45 AM UTC-7, Maxime Boissonneault wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am compiling Sage from source on Linux, on a supercomputer. Libraries
> and headers are in non-standard locations. When the make tries to build
> pillow, it fa
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 2:13:30 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:10 PM Matthias Koeppe
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 7:21:35 AM UTC-7, ilyub wrote:
> >>
> >> The cygwin people seemed to have rem
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 7:21:35 AM UTC-7, ilyub wrote:
>
> The cygwin people seemed to have removed the physical file (xlocale.h)
> from the cygwin distribution starting with version 3.1.1-1
> https://cygwin.com/packages/summary/cygwin-devel.html.
> Because the include file is missing, sag
On Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 9:23:38 AM UTC-7, pedrito...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Matthias,
> In teaching,
>
> https://cursos-0-fc-ugr.github.io/Matematicas/derivadas-app-estudio-func-thebelab.html
>
> https://github.com/pedritomelenas/Algebra-conmutativa-y-computacional
>
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 2:09:20 PM UTC-7, David Joyner wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:58 PM Matthias Koeppe > wrote:
>
>>
>> There is now a schedule at
>> https://researchseminars.org/seminar/SageDays109
>>
>
> Are the times liste
On Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 11:25:56 PM UTC-7, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> On Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 12:18:08 PM UTC-7, Ingo Dahn wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like an interesting event, what is the intended audience?
>> Developers? Researchers? Educators?
>>
>
>
update in 5 years!
- Julian Rüth - Introduction to running SageMath in Docker
- Matthias Köppe - Tutorial for developers: Portability testing of the Sage
distribution using Docker and the Sage distro-package database
- Haroldo G. Santos - On the design of Python-MIP: Why another Python
al event. We plan to record and make
available presentations (when the presenters give us permission to do so.)
Matthias
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fr
OK, I know how *I* use SageMath.
But how do *you* use it? Let us know in the online SageMath User Forum.
This is one of the activities of next week's *Global Virtual SageDays 109*,
a 50-hour virtual event held May 27–29, 2020.
Preliminary information and registration at
https://wiki.sagemath.o
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/discrete_geometry/sage/geometry/polyhedron/base.html#sage.geometry.polyhedron.base.Polyhedron_base.integral_points
On Friday, April 17, 2020 at 11:16:30 AM UTC-7, Bert Henry wrote:
>
> I tried it with
> var('x, y')
> assume(x,"integer")
> assume(x>0)
> ass
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
