x4 + 2 x5 + 2 x6 + 2 x7 + 2 x8 + 2 x9
.
===
Hence by solving this LP in Sage or with a *.lp solver, one obtains different
results. Am I missing something or is this a bug in write_lp?
Best,
Jernej
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hello,
I just unpacked the tarball for 7.1 linked on the Sage Download page. When
I try to iterate over graphs with nauty_geng, nothing happens:
==
sage: for G in graphs.nauty_geng("10"):
G
:
sage:
==
and in fact,
sage: list(graphs.nauty_geng("7"))
[]
I figured that in the old S
gives the (expected) NameError: name 'combinations' is not defined,
capitalizing combinations gives
ValueError: libGAP: Syntax error: ; expected
Combinations of [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] of length 2;
Best,
Jernej
On Thursday, 24 March 2016 07:36:55 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
ge: A = G.automorphism_group()
sage: libgap(A)
python: libgap.c:186: libgap_get_input: Assertion
`strlen(libGAP_stdin_buffer) < length' failed.
===
Is there a way to overcome this limitation?
Best,
Jernej
On Tuesday, 22 March 2016 14:18:56 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, Mar
ready done for specific orbits ) ?
Best,
Jernej
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post t
Hello,
thank you for this! The admins were now able to successfully install Sage
on the grid.
All the best,
Jernej
On Friday, 29 May 2015 01:26:00 UTC+2, William wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've put a working sage-6.7 build on a minimal CentOS 6 install here:
>
> http://
CentOS 6? Which
specific version should that be?
If not, do you have any other suggestions how to install Sage on the system
without causing too much hassle to the admins?
Thanks,
Jernej
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
0m0.858s
===
I thought that may be interesting to you as well.
Best,
Jernej
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 22:33:46 UTC+1, Jernej wrote:
>
> Dear sage-support,
>
> I have stumbled into a performance bottleneck in one of my Sage programs.
> I would like to share the relevant p
sults directly as
> Sage objects using "save" and not as strings... No idea, you need to
> test things ^^;
>
Thanks for the suggestions I'll check them out.
>
> Nathann
>
> On 4 December 2014 at 03:44, Nils Bruin >
> wrote:
> > On
en that I have
millions of such matrices it would take years to process all the input.
Other than rewriting the whole thing in C I currently do not see any viable
solution. Hence I am wondering: Do you guys happen to see any clever
optimization? Is there a way to compute the named product m
g you:
1. Do you have any cool examples of Sage usage to share (anything that is
fun for you really)
2. If you were to have a Sage workshop for students what would you talk
about?
Best,
Jernej
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support&
instead of adding several toolboxes what do you think about
integrating with http://orange.biolab.si/ ? They already have a python
interface...
On Aug 22, 7:14 pm, samontab wrote:
> I found a nice toolbox full of "routines for inference and learning in
> graphical models and machine learning" ava
Can't reach www.sagemath.org or www.sagenb.org. Has anybody else same
problems? Was that somewhere announced?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this
13 matches
Mail list logo
