Simon,
You're right, and you pointed the way to an easy solution. Thanks for
the help.
Jeff
On Jun 5, 11:46 pm, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On 6 Jun., 04:33, Jeff Stroomer wrote:
>
> > M = Matrix([
> > [ 1, 0, 0, 0],
> > [ 0, 1,
;ve seen this in sage-4.6.2, and in sage-4.7. If it makes a
difference, I've applied patch trac_11316 to each.
Thanks for the help,
Jeff Stroomer
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googl
Everyone,
Many apologies, false alarm. This problem does indeed exist in Sage
4.7, but is fixed by patch trac_11316. I assumed this patch was part
of 4.7, but apparently it's not.
Jeff
On Jun 5, 12:25 pm, Jeff Stroomer wrote:
> I installed sage 4.7 a moment ago, and am runnin
raise ValueError, "Invalid matrix constructor. Type matrix?
for help"
ValueError: Invalid matrix constructor. Type matrix? for help
Thanks for the help,
Jeff Stroomer
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Martin, Kwankyu,
Victory! Using Martin's instructions, I was able to apply the patch
to sage 4.6.2, and I'm now getting the right answers when my term
order matrix contains negative values. Thanks so much for all your
help.
Jeff
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroup
Kwankyu,
Thanks for the fix. I tried to apply the patch against a clean copy
of Sage-4.6.2, but ran into the following:
sage: hg_sage.patch('trac_11316.patch')
cd "/Applications/sage/devel/sage" && hg status
cd "/Applications/sage/devel/sage" && hg status
cd "/Applications/sage/devel/sage" && h
Martin,
> The patch by Kwankyu Lee seems to allow that, i.e. you can give a Singular
> string an pass force=True, which *should* pass it through to Singular.
Sorry, I never before knew that sage has a patching mechanism. I did
give it a try, and verified that the patch was indeed installed and
r
he Sage community have invested in this tool. A lot of my
research has come out of what I've been able to write in Sage.
Jeff Stroomer
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@google
test.The alternative for me is to code directly
in Singular, or figure out how to hack around the limitation in
term_order.py.
Thanks in advance,
Jeff Stroomer
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsu
ation cheaply.
Jeff
On Feb 21, 3:05 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:28:09 -0800 (PST)
>
> Jeff Stroomer wrote:
> > Sage Folks,
>
> > I am working on a problem that requires me to generate a large matrix
> > over QQ, and then calcu
place, or is it
really not there? Also, is it reasonable for me to think this is
likely to speed up the calculations?
Thanks for the help,
Jeff Stroomer
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-suppor
uce(), but use the normal multiplication and
addition operations on polynomials?
Jeff
On Feb 15, 3:24 am, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Jeff Stroomer
> wrote:
> > > William,
William,
I used GF(101), GF(1009), and GF(199).
Jeff
On Feb 14, 5:21 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeff Stroomer wrote:
> > Everyone,
>
> > I'm wondering if there's an easy way to count the number of operations
> > perform
William,
I used GF(101), GF(1009), and GF(199).
Jeff
On Feb 14, 5:21 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeff Stroomer wrote:
> > Everyone,
>
> > I'm wondering if there's an easy way to count the number of operations
> > perform
ay.
Thanks in advance for the help,
Jeff Stroomer
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Core 2 Duo.
Jeff
On Jan 18, 1:47 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> > Hi Jeff,
>
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Jeff Stroomer
> > wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> #! /usr/bin/env sage
>
> >
advance for helping me with this - and if I'm doing
something wrong, please let me know.
Jeff Stroomer
___
#! /usr/bin/env sage
import sys, os
from sage.all import *
R = PolynomialRing(QQ, 4, names = 'u,z,y,x', ord
ms if possible.
So is there a better way for me to handle the ring change?
Thanks in advance for the help,
Jeff Stroomer
---
#! /usr/bin/env sage
import sys, os
from sage.all import *
R = PolynomialRing(QQ, 3, nam
18 matches
Mail list logo