Re: [sage-support] How to start

2019-03-18 Thread Ike Stoddard
And your hardware, the cpu you are using? On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:38 Deepak Pawar wrote: > Ubuntu 16.4 > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 1:14 AM Ike Stoddard > wrote: > >> What is your hardware? What is your operating system? >> >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 06:55

Re: [sage-support] How to start

2019-03-17 Thread Ike Stoddard
What is your hardware? What is your operating system? On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 06:55 Deepak Pawar wrote: > I already had installed the sage in my machine. > > Don't know how to open it > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-support" group. > To

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-31 Thread Ike Stoddard
We might as well close this. If gfortran8 messes up, I can open another. On Thu, Jan 31, 2019, 02:38 Ike Stoddard THEY ARE THERE. > > Under other circumstances, I would have thought of removing all other > toolchains which were not current. > I will try to do so. My package ma

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-31 Thread Ike Stoddard
THEY ARE THERE. Under other circumstances, I would have thought of removing all other toolchains which were not current. I will try to do so. My package manager is not finding the off-nominal configs. Arch Linux 4.20.3 btw. So that nothing is damaged, I must research if anything needs gcc-

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-30 Thread Ike Stoddard
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.31.1 On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 3:39:22 PM UTC-6, Isuru Fernando wrote: > > What's your binutils version? (You can find that out by doing "ld > --version") > > Isuru > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" gr

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-30 Thread Ike Stoddard
>> have you checked that configure accepted FC you supplied, and there were no attempt to build gfortran by Sage? >> (e.g. look for logs/pkgs/gfortran, or look what you got in config.log) That is the clue. In gsl's config.log, $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/Misc/sage-8.6/local --libdir

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-30 Thread Ike Stoddard
These three, supposedly. *which gfortran gfortran-5 gfortran-6* provides /usr/bin/gfortran /usr/bin/gfortran-5 /usr/bin/gfortran-6 and commanding *gfortran{version} -v* *gives* gcc version 8.2.1 20181127 (GCC) gcc version 5.5.0 (GCC) gcc version 6.4.1 20180809 (GCC) and libgfortran is found

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-30 Thread Ike Stoddard
I get Error building Sage. The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily during this run of 'make all-start'): * package: gsl-2.5 log file: /usr/local/src/Misc/sage-8.6/logs/pkgs/gsl-2.5.log build directory: /usr/local/src/Misc/sage-8.6/local/var/tmp/sage/build/gsl-2.5

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-28 Thread Ike Stoddard
the newer ones, > something like > > ./configure CC=gcc7 CXX=g++7 FC=gfortran7 > > And then rebuild from scratch... > > On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 04:32 Ike Stoddard >> Scenario: building sage 8.6 from source. >> Build seems to want to make scipy-1.1.0. >> Final

[sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-27 Thread Ike Stoddard
Scenario: building sage 8.6 from source. Build seems to want to make scipy-1.1.0. Final results were: Error building Sage. The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily during this run of 'make all-start'): * package: scipy-1.1.0 log file: /usr/local/src/Misc/sage-8.6/logs/