[sage-support] decomposition of fractional ideals (converting PARI to SAGE) - revisited

2010-07-24 Thread Chan-Ho
ision too low in get_norm. However, when I just use PARI/GP (version 2.3.4), the decomposition works, even very fast. PARI gave me the following: [[3, [-2, 1, 1, 1, 1, -1]~, 1, 1, [2, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1]~], [3, [1, -1, -1, 0,-1, 0]~, 2, 1, [1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1]~], [3, [1, 1, 0, -1, 1, -1]~, 1, 1, [1, 2, 1,0, 0,

[sage-support] Re: decomposition of fractional ideals (converting PARI to SAGE)

2010-06-24 Thread Chan-Ho
Hi All, I am now at the SAGE22 workshop and directly asked William Stein concerning this. He showed me a line proof.number_field(False) Then we can turn off the certification process and the decomposition may work. Thanks, Chan-Ho On May 7, 10:20 am, Chan-Ho wrote: > Hi All, > >

[sage-support] decomposition of fractional ideals (converting PARI to SAGE)

2010-05-07 Thread Chan-Ho
ec_form(K_f2, ideal1) But the Minkowski error occured again here. This means that the Minkowski error comes from the translation between PARI and SAGE? Is there a better method to compute this in SAGE? Cheers, Chan-Ho -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubsc