Okay, thanks very much for all your prompt and helpful replies!
On 30 March 2017 at 09:42, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 10:38:49 AM UTC+2, Brent Pym wrote:
>>
>> Thank you very much! By opening these tickets, you have certainly
>> answered my questio
Thank you very much! By opening these tickets, you have certainly answered
my questions. Is the etiquette to mark this thread as complete now, or
wait until the tickets have been closed?
On Thursday, 30 March 2017 08:58:07 UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> I also opened https://trac.sagemath.org/
Also, I realized that, more generally, conjugate passes through sin because
of the holomorphicity:
sage: conjugate(sin(1+I))
sin(-I + 1)
Maybe this would be nice for other holomorphic functions, like zeta? But
perhaps that's how you had in mind to implement it anyways.
--
You received this mes
>
> Yes, the elementary functions had this implemented only recently, and I'm
> happy to add more knowledge like that.
>
Great, thanks a lot!
Do I understand correctly that multiple polylogs and multiple zeta values
are implemented in GiNaC/Pynac but not yet wrapped in SageMath?
--
You recei
For a real number *s*, the value* zeta(s)* of the Riemann zeta function is
real, but SageMath does not seem to recognize this fact. Here is an
example (SageMath 7.5.1):
sage: conjugate(zeta(3))
conjugate(zeta(3))
One might hope to simply get zeta(3)as output. Indeed, this is how the sin
func
