There are a number of ways in which sage assumes you only have a single
version of python installed. The main reason for introducing the python3
package was so developers interested in porting sage to python 3 could
easily try building sage with python 3 instead of python 2.
--
You received this
It is wrong, but not as wrong as you make it out to be. Your function is f
= abs(h), where h = 2*cos(5/8*sqrt(x)+1/2)/sqrt(x). Rather that integrating
f, it seems to have integrated h.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscri
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:13 PM, john_perry_usm wrote:
>
> Try the following:
>>
>> sage: e = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).e() # construct the symmetric functions
>> with the e basis
>> sage: m = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).m() # ditto but with the monomial basis
>> sage: m421 = m[4, 2, 1] # create the mono
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:12 PM, john_perry_usm wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In the manual (
> www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/sf/monomial.html)
> there is a nice example of enumerating and expanding symmetric functions in
> terms of x's.
>
> Is there a way to write the monomial symm
Hi Dan et al,
Presumably you are looking for something along the lines of
github.com/ohanar/math3d.js? It is (again) a fork of the SMC's plotting
solution, although with the express purpose of being a standalone library.
Part of the reason why I haven't really advertised it much is that I hadn't
Actually you should only need the RH to prove that this method is reasonably
fast. I don't think sage has Li^{-1} implemented, which is really what you need
in order to implement this (Li ~ pi, so Li^{-1} ~ pi^{-1} = nth_prime function).
There has been some effort to include the open source libr
