On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 10:28:37 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> I don't really understand your concrete problem though. Why can't you
> build Sage the "usual" way (without easybuild), Volker's post explains
> how you can use the system ATLAS library.
>
> Well sure that's a possibilit
Hi William,
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:25:43 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>
> But this is a nonstarter given our requirements for Sage: "EasyBuild
> has mainly been tested on RPM-based 64-bit Linux systems, i.e.,
> Scientific Linux 5.x/6.x. Support for other Linux distributions and
> operating
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 4:44:47 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> You can set SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=no and SAGE_ATLAS_LIB=. If you need to
> customize it further you'll have to edit build/deps
>
There's no way that's more convinient (autotools et cetera)? Might I
suggest that SAGE takes a look
usters for scientific and developmental use. This is close to
impossible unless we use your provided defaults.
My question basically is: How do I properly build SAGE without using your own
dependency and buildkit as provided via the Makefiles and build/ directory?
Thank you for your time,
Aa
