or maybe another error if there
is a bug) if it can't compute a limit.
Aaron Meurer
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 6:42 PM, William Stein wrote:
> This definitely looks like a bug. In the meantime, a workaround is to
> use sympy:
>
> sage: var('m a0')
> (m, a0)
> sag
"skip" certain steps, for instance. A human
isn't going to run through the full Euclidean algorithm to compute
gcd(1, x), for instance, and even for gcd(x, x**2 + x) a human can see
the answer right away without running through any polynomial long
division.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Oct
And I should note that Tom's code can also compute the Laplace
transform if you want to do it that way:
In [13]: var('s')
Out[13]: s
In [14]: inverse_laplace_transform(exp(-5*s)/s, s, t)
Out[14]: Heaviside(t - 5)
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Aaron Meurer wro
n accepted yet. If not, can
someone forward it?
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM, David Joyner wrote:
> AFAIK, Sage cannot at this time take the inverse Laplace transform of
> something of the form e^{-5s}/s.
>
> I think Sympy (included with Sage) can
> http://docs.symp
