researching on the status of cunningham_tables spkg, one finds
it was slated to become standard, but them someone pointed out
that Brent's tables are better, and it leads to
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12133
which is in "needs work" state, and links pointing to
files on a dead server.
On Thu,
it (with -p option) does work on a recent Sage 9.1 beta.
Specfically, I got the file here:
http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/www.sagemath.org//spkg/optional/cunningham_tables-1.0.spkg
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 4:15 PM 'Peter Mueller' via sage-support
wrote:
>
> Locally compiled versions of Sage
Locally compiled versions of Sage on two up-to-date Manjaro Linux machines,
and the binary distribution on a Debian 9 machine. In all three cases Sage
version 9.0.
Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2020 16:53:48 UTC+1 schrieb vdelecroix:
>
> What is your setup?
>
> Le 12/03/2020 à 14:15, 'Peter Mueller'
What is your setup?
Le 12/03/2020 à 14:15, 'Peter Mueller' via sage-support a écrit :
Calling the example
from sage.rings.factorint import factor_cunningham
factor_cunningham(2^257-1)
from the docs yields the message that the Cunningham tables should be
installed via ``sage -i cunningham_tables
Calling the example
from sage.rings.factorint import factor_cunningham
factor_cunningham(2^257-1)
from the docs yields the message that the Cunningham tables should be
installed via ``sage -i cunningham_tables``. Trying this, however, yields
a `not found' message, and suggests to try the option
