Re: [sage-support] Re: arrows in 3d field plots

2019-01-30 Thread Tevian Dray
>> You can use the plot functionality of vector fields on >> Euclidean spaces to get better arrowheads: OK; I can get jmol to work with some browsers, although it is painfully slow. But the results are very nice. >> And is there a way to disable the perspective view? >> I want the 2d-view seen

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-30 Thread Ike Stoddard
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.31.1 On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 3:39:22 PM UTC-6, Isuru Fernando wrote: > > What's your binutils version? (You can find that out by doing "ld > --version") > > Isuru > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" gr

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-30 Thread Ike Stoddard
>> have you checked that configure accepted FC you supplied, and there were no attempt to build gfortran by Sage? >> (e.g. look for logs/pkgs/gfortran, or look what you got in config.log) That is the clue. In gsl's config.log, $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/Misc/sage-8.6/local --libdir

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-30 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 21:11, Ike Stoddard wrote: > These three, supposedly. > *which gfortran gfortran-5 gfortran-6* > provides > /usr/bin/gfortran > /usr/bin/gfortran-5 > /usr/bin/gfortran-6 > > and commanding *gfortran{version} -v* > *gives* > gcc version 8.2.1 20181127 (GCC) > gcc version 5.

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-30 Thread Isuru Fernando
What's your binutils version? (You can find that out by doing "ld --version") Isuru -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@goo

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-30 Thread Ike Stoddard
These three, supposedly. *which gfortran gfortran-5 gfortran-6* provides /usr/bin/gfortran /usr/bin/gfortran-5 /usr/bin/gfortran-6 and commanding *gfortran{version} -v* *gives* gcc version 8.2.1 20181127 (GCC) gcc version 5.5.0 (GCC) gcc version 6.4.1 20180809 (GCC) and libgfortran is found

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-30 Thread Dima Pasechnik
how many different installations of grfortran do you have on the machine? are any of them functional? On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 08:25, Ike Stoddard wrote: > I get > Error building Sage. > > The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily > during this run of 'make all-start'): >

Re: [sage-support] Scipy 1.1.0 instead of 1.2.0 built for Sage 8.6 ??? ALso cannot find libgfortran???

2019-01-30 Thread Ike Stoddard
I get Error building Sage. The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily during this run of 'make all-start'): * package: gsl-2.5 log file: /usr/local/src/Misc/sage-8.6/logs/pkgs/gsl-2.5.log build directory: /usr/local/src/Misc/sage-8.6/local/var/tmp/sage/build/gsl-2.5