Hi Adam,
On 2017-03-30, Adam Mullins wrote:
> Shouldn't 0 in R return true as well?
Does it not?? That should certainly work with the fix from
the ticket that I mentioned.
Best regards,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
I'm installing Sage for the first time, on a Mac OS El Capitan. I
downloaded from:
http://files.sagemath.org/osx/intel/index.html
the file sage-7.6-OSX_10.12.3-x86_64.app.dmg, and dragged Sage into
Applications.
The first time I opened Sage, a window opened that asked if I wanted to
update som
Hi Simon,
Shouldn't 0 in R return true as well?
Thank you
On Wednesday, March 29, 2017 at 8:14:28 AM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 2017-03-28, Adam Mullins > wrote:
> > Hi, I create a free algebra like such:
> >
> > R. = FreeAlgebra(Integers(2))
> >
> > When I try to check if th
Okay, thanks very much for all your prompt and helpful replies!
On 30 March 2017 at 09:42, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 10:38:49 AM UTC+2, Brent Pym wrote:
>>
>> Thank you very much! By opening these tickets, you have certainly
>> answered my questions. Is the etiquette
On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 10:38:49 AM UTC+2, Brent Pym wrote:
>
> Thank you very much! By opening these tickets, you have certainly
> answered my questions. Is the etiquette to mark this thread as complete
> now, or wait until the tickets have been closed?
>
Threads in sage-devel or -supp
Thank you very much! By opening these tickets, you have certainly answered
my questions. Is the etiquette to mark this thread as complete now, or
wait until the tickets have been closed?
On Thursday, 30 March 2017 08:58:07 UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> I also opened https://trac.sagemath.org/
I also opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22713
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this g
On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 9:08:24 AM UTC+2, Brent Pym wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that multiple polylogs and multiple zeta values
are implemented in GiNaC/Pynac but not yet wrapped in SageMath?
They are in GiNaC but the code in Pynac is degenerated for various reasons,
eg the numeric
Also, I realized that, more generally, conjugate passes through sin because
of the holomorphicity:
sage: conjugate(sin(1+I))
sin(-I + 1)
Maybe this would be nice for other holomorphic functions, like zeta? But
perhaps that's how you had in mind to implement it anyways.
--
You received this mes
>
> Yes, the elementary functions had this implemented only recently, and I'm
> happy to add more knowledge like that.
>
Great, thanks a lot!
Do I understand correctly that multiple polylogs and multiple zeta values
are implemented in GiNaC/Pynac but not yet wrapped in SageMath?
--
You recei
10 matches
Mail list logo
