Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage Crash Report. appears to have loaded, failed to run.

2017-03-07 Thread Vegard Lima
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:56 AM, John H Palmieri wrote: > Just about the last line in your crash report says > >ImportError: libgfortran.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such > file or directory > > So you need to install gfortran, however that is done with Fedora. An > internet search

[sage-support] Re: Sage Crash Report. appears to have loaded, failed to run.

2017-03-07 Thread John H Palmieri
Just about the last line in your crash report says ImportError: libgfortran.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory So you need to install gfortran, however that is done with Fedora. An internet search suggests something like "yum install gcc-gfortran". -- John

[sage-support] Calculations in group algebras and Finite groups as quotients of finitely presented groups

2017-03-07 Thread Bharathwaj Palvannan
Hi, I am trying to work with group rings of the form Q[G], where Q is the field of rational numbers and G is a finite (not necessarily abelian) group. To create the group G, I have tried to express the group G as a quotient of a free group, using some of the techniques mentioned here

[sage-support] Sage Crash Report. appears to have loaded, failed to run.

2017-03-07 Thread wemmel
Team SageMath, Thankyou for providing the email address Sage will not load and run properly on my Fedora Linux System (used the latest Linux build Sage-7.5.1-Fedora). Printed out readme file you provided, and executed it to the best of my ability. Sage crashed, not sure why. No

Re: [sage-support] OS X 10.12

2017-03-07 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Mar 7, 2017, at 11:14 , crownea...@gmail.com wrote: > Does SAGE work on OS X 10.12? I moved SageMath to my applications > directory and then > > ┐ > │ SageMath version 7.5.1, Release Date: 2017-01-15 │ > │

[sage-support] Re: OS X 10.12

2017-03-07 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Yes it does work on 10.12. Could you provide the link to the binary package you tried to install? (It might be broken...) On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 7:14:01 PM UTC, crown...@gmail.com wrote: > > Does SAGE work on OS X 10.12? I moved SageMath to my applications > directory and then > >

[sage-support] OS X 10.12

2017-03-07 Thread crownea...@gmail.com
Does SAGE work on OS X 10.12? I moved SageMath to my applications directory and then ┐ │ SageMath version 7.5.1, Release Date: 2017-01-15 │ │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface.│

Re: [sage-support] Re: Patterson Algorithm

2017-03-07 Thread Johan S . H . Rosenkilde
Hi Panos, > I finally implement the decoder using lattice basis reduction (using LLL) I presume you mean F[x]-lattice basis reduction, i.e. row reduction of F[x] matrices (the LLL is for integer matrices). > The only thing left is to reduce the execution time of the decoder by > finding the mo

[sage-support] Re: Patterson Algorithm

2017-03-07 Thread Panos Phronimos
Thanks Johan, I finally implement the decoder using lattice basis reduction (using LLL) The only thing left is to reduce the execution time of the decoder by finding the most efficient way to locate the errors via the error locator poynomial (something better than chien search) If you are inter

Re: [sage-support] Running sage scripts noninteractively (possible bug)

2017-03-07 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-03-07 10:19, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2017-03-06 23:58, Watson Ladd wrote: Or should I just change to load instead of attach? The problem is limited to load(), so that would work. Sorry: I meant to say: the problem is limited to attach(), so load() should work. -- You received thi

Re: [sage-support] Running sage scripts noninteractively (possible bug)

2017-03-07 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-03-06 23:58, Watson Ladd wrote: Or should I just change to load instead of attach? The problem is limited to load(), so that would work. Thinking about it, actually attach() only makes sense in interactive sessions. So I see no reason to use it in scripts. -- You received this messa