Hi Marc,
On 2017-01-07, Marc Mezzarobba wrote:
> Another trick you can use if you are creating the polynomial rings
> yourself and only need to do basic arithmetic is to define them by
>
> PolynomialRing_field(base, var, element_class=Polynomial_generic_dense)
>
> instead of PolynomialRing(base,
Nils Bruin wrote:
> polynomial aritmetic over ZZ and QQ is so much more optimized than
> over number fields,
Yes, polynomial arithmetic over number fields is painfully slow. The
branch trac:u/mmezzarobba/speed_up_generic_polynomials (not fully tested
yet) may help a little.
Another trick you ca
Le 05/01/2017 à 11:33, Daniel Krenn a écrit :
On 2017-01-05 11:29, Daniel Krenn wrote:
On 2017-01-05 10:55, Daniel Krenn wrote:
as there is no *canonical* coercion as no embedding of the number field
is specified.
How can I specify this embedding such that it is used e.g. for the
symbolic I?
