Re: [sage-support] \leq converted to <=, can't we use unicode?

2015-10-05 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Dima Pasechnik wrote: In docstrings we have \leq converted to <=, can't we use unicode, and get ≤? More importantly, can we do similar things to \cap (∩) and \cup (∪), and perhaps even more of this? What we assume the user to have on command line? I just read your email i

[sage-support] Re: No module named _sysconfigdata

2015-10-05 Thread ksk...@gmail.com
Followup: I just solved my own problem, so I can share my story in case it helps... My system (a big shared cluster) has a modular system for loading/unloading standard packages, including Python. The standard python2 provided by the system is somewhat older (2.7.3, as you can see from the path

[sage-support] Re: No module named _sysconfigdata

2015-10-05 Thread ksk...@gmail.com
The same thing just happened to me! Here's the traceback I got: gcc -pthread -L/gpfs_home/kedlaya/sage-6.8/local/lib -Xlinker -export-dynamic -o python \ Modules/python.o \ -L. -lpython2.7 -lpthread -ldl -lutil -lm LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/gpfs_home/kedlaya/sage-6.8/local/var/tmp/sage/build/python2

Re: [sage-support] Re: Where is possible to view the code of one command? for example: lagrange_polynomial?

2015-10-05 Thread kcrisman
> > > Also this does not work with all (longer?) functions in the notebook. Try > > g = Graph() > g.plot?? > > for an example of one kind of a bug. > > In the notebook sometimes if there is something with Traceback... then it cuts off there, see https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/issues/34 "

[sage-support] Re: Where is possible to view the code of one command? for example: lagrange_polynomial?

2015-10-05 Thread kcrisman
> > The source code of Python built-ins can not be obtained by the "??". But > if you have an object (a function, a type, and instance, ...) that is > defined in the SageMath library, then "??" should give you the source code > and "?" should give you the doc string. If it doesn't then it is a

[sage-support] Re: \leq converted to <=, can't we use unicode?

2015-10-05 Thread Volker Braun
src/sage/misc/sagedoc.py On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 9:37:49 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Monday, 5 October 2015 12:20:45 UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> +1: write a patch >> > > do you know where to look for the code doing the replacement '\leq' -> > '<=' ? > > >> >> On Monday

[sage-support] Re: \leq converted to <=, can't we use unicode?

2015-10-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, 5 October 2015 12:20:45 UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > +1: write a patch > do you know where to look for the code doing the replacement '\leq' -> '<=' ? > > On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 9:10:30 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> In docstrings we have \leq converted to <=, can'

[sage-support] Re: \leq converted to <=, can't we use unicode?

2015-10-05 Thread Volker Braun
+1: write a patch On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 9:10:30 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > In docstrings we have \leq converted to <=, can't we use unicode, and get > ≤? More importantly, can we do similar > things to \cap (∩) and \cup (∪), and perhaps even more of this? > > Dima > -- You rece

[sage-support] \leq converted to <=, can't we use unicode?

2015-10-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
In docstrings we have \leq converted to <=, can't we use unicode, and get ≤? More importantly, can we do similar things to \cap (∩) and \cup (∪), and perhaps even more of this? Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscrib

Re: [sage-support] Re: Where is possible to view the code of one command? for example: lagrange_polynomial?

2015-10-05 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, kcrisman wrote: sage: lagrange_polynomial?? # should be code Note that the latter doesn't always work (for instance Python built-ins, or some (all?) Cythonized functions) or so it seems to me. Also this does not work with all (longer?) functions in the notebook. Try g =

[sage-support] Re: Where is possible to view the code of one command? for example: lagrange_polynomial?

2015-10-05 Thread Simon King
Hi Karl-Dieter, On 2015-10-05, kcrisman wrote: >> Hi everyone, where it is possible to find the code of each command or >> maybe documentation? For example lagrange_polynomial. How can one see the >> function code, but documention would be better. Thank you in advance. >> > > sage: lagrange_pol

Re: [sage-support] Where is possible to view the code of one command? for example: lagrange_polynomial?

2015-10-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/05/2015 10:05 AM, Dmitrij Moreinis wrote: > Hi everyone, where it is possible to find the code of each command or > maybe documentation? For example lagrange_polynomial. How can one see > the function code, but documention would be better. Thank you in advance. > Type the function name foll

[sage-support] Re: Where is possible to view the code of one command? for example: lagrange_polynomial?

2015-10-05 Thread kcrisman
> Hi everyone, where it is possible to find the code of each command or > maybe documentation? For example lagrange_polynomial. How can one see the > function code, but documention would be better. Thank you in advance. > sage: lagrange_polynomial? # should be doc sage: lagrange_polynomial?? #

[sage-support] Where is possible to view the code of one command? for example: lagrange_polynomial?

2015-10-05 Thread Dmitrij Moreinis
Hi everyone, where it is possible to find the code of each command or maybe documentation? For example lagrange_polynomial. How can one see the function code, but documention would be better. Thank you in advance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sa

[sage-support] Re: Sage-6.8.app error in OS X El Capitan

2015-10-05 Thread Aaron Espinosa Asencio
Hi, thanks you very much, it works for me atm. I hope an official fix in the future. El lunes, 5 de octubre de 2015, 6:48:50 (UTC+2), Dima Pasechnik escribió: > > it seems that you will need to disable SIP: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/OBv5x1v3_6M/sOunnE-7BQAJ > > > On Sunday, 4 O