[sage-support] Re: Broken links to

Hi Dima, On 2015-08-28, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > will still give you ssh access, to the same files in your homedir. > (at least it works for me). Not for me. > I'd suggest that you start by, at least, hosting the package's git (or is > it hg?) repo on github. > This takes 5 minutes to set up o

[sage-support] Re: Broken links to

Hi William, On 2015-08-28, William A Stein wrote: > Simon, etc. -- find hosting elsewhere. Github makes hosting of <2GB > binaries for free trivial, so use that. The data base is > 30GB, if I recall correctly. And how can I log into my account at sage.math.washington.edu? Best regards, Simon

[sage-support] Re: Broken links to

On Friday, 28 August 2015 07:20:12 UTC-7, Simon King wrote: > > Hi Karl-Dieter, > > On 2015-08-28, kcrisman > wrote: > > I think that was a result of some legal wrangling at UW regarding what > Sage > > stuff is/isn't permissible, and at least for some time everything was > > turned off... i

[sage-support] Re: Running Sage through Apache2 with Reverse Proxy

My test server will be unavailable this weekend as my campus will have no electricity. I will bring it back up as soon as possible on Monday. Jonathan On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 4:05:20 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Gutow wrote: > > Another option for simple testing is to create an account on my test

[sage-support] Re: Broken links to

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:59 AM, kcrisman wrote: >> >> On 2015-08-28, Scott Morrison wrote: >> > There are a number of sources around the web that refer to >> > for >> > explanations of doing group cohomology calculations in Sage, but th

[sage-support] Re: Strange _.extension() function behavior

I should add that I am running all of the above commands on the SMC on a free account. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@

[sage-support] Strange _.extension() function behavior

Hullo all, Can someone explain the following behavior to me? I would like to to create an extension of the field of rational functions in one variable 'y' over the finite field of three elements by adjoining a root of unity 'Y' and an element of Carlitz torsion 'X'. I run the following comman

[sage-support] Re: Broken links to

Hi Karl-Dieter, On 2015-08-28, kcrisman wrote: > I think that was a result of some legal wrangling at UW regarding what Sage > stuff is/isn't permissible, and at least for some time everything was > turned off... iirc? William, I recall you saying that, for the long-term, > hosting precisely

[sage-support] Re: Broken links to

> > > On 2015-08-28, Scott Morrison wrote: > > There are a number of sources around the web that refer to > > for > > explanations of doing group cohomology calculations in Sage, but that > link > > is now broken. > > Wow, that's b

[sage-support] Re: Broken links to

Hi Scott, On 2015-08-28, Scott Morrison wrote: > There are a number of sources around the web that refer to > for > explanations of doing group cohomology calculations in Sage, but that link > is now broken. Wow, that's bad. And I (a

[sage-support] Broken links to

There are a number of sources around the web that refer to for explanations of doing group cohomology calculations in Sage, but that link is now broken. (And hence I, personally, gave up on using Sage to do my group cohomology calcula