Re: [sage-support] Can't install latest sagmath-upstream-binary from ppa

2015-05-31 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi Please do to revert to 6.6: wget https://launchpad.net/~aims/+archive/ubuntu/sagemath/+build/7362961/+files/sagemath-upstream-binary_6.6ppa1_amd64.deb sudo dpkg -i https://

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage math on CentOS 6

2015-05-31 Thread Jernej
Hello, thank you for this! The admins were now able to successfully install Sage on the grid. All the best, Jernej On Friday, 29 May 2015 01:26:00 UTC+2, William wrote: > > Hi, > > I've put a working sage-6.7 build on a minimal CentOS 6 install here: > > http://wstein.org/tmp/sage-6.7-ce

[sage-support] Can't install latest sagmath-upstream-binary from ppa

2015-05-31 Thread Huayi Wei
Hi, there, I met the following error when I install sage from ppa. My system is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64bit. I need your help. Thanks very much. Best Huayi ``` :~$ sudo apt-get install sagemath-upstream-binary Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Don

[sage-support] Re: 6.7 ova release for VM VirtualBox

2015-05-31 Thread Volker Braun
The Sage-6.7 VM is now available at http://files.sagemath.org/win/sage-6.7.ova On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 2:51:56 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > Thanks for the reminder, I just started a new build. Right now the ova is > made on my laptop, if somebody were to volunteer a buildbot slave with

[sage-support] Re: Is there some way of testing that Maxima simplified something?

2015-05-31 Thread David Einstein
Thanks. I'll look inside subst The reason I ask is that I've been looking at `floor` and deep inside there is a line return floor(SR(x).full_simplify().canonicalize_radical()) Now, if x is some complicated expression that maxima does not simplify, but is equivalent to an integ

[sage-support] Re: Is there some way of testing that Maxima simplified something?

2015-05-31 Thread Nils Bruin
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 8:08:52 AM UTC-7, David Einstein wrote: > > Given a symbolic expression u is there some way to tell if u.simplify() > accomplished something? All I can think of is comparing the string > representations, and that seems a bit silly. > > For example, > sage: u = sin(x)^

[sage-support] Is there some way of testing that Maxima simplified something?

2015-05-31 Thread David Einstein
Given a symbolic expression u is there some way to tell if u.simplify() accomplished something? All I can think of is comparing the string representations, and that seems a bit silly. For example, sage: u = sin(x)^2 + cos(x)^2 sage: u.simplify() cos(x)^2 + sin(x)^2 sage: u.full_simplify() 1 I

[sage-support] Re: 6.7 ova release for VM VirtualBox

2015-05-31 Thread Volker Braun
Thanks for the reminder, I just started a new build. Right now the ova is made on my laptop, if somebody were to volunteer a buildbot slave with virtualbox installed and permissions suitable to create virtual images we could automatize it. On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 11:36:57 AM UTC+2, Roland

[sage-support] 6.7 ova release for VM VirtualBox

2015-05-31 Thread Rolandb
Hi, Will sage-6.7.ova be released soon? Is there some kind of policy? I noticed that *.ova files are released irregularly. Thanks, Roland -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving email