[sage-support] Re: ideal in ring of integers: QQ vs number field

The same workaround that works in magma, also works in sage: sage: K=NumberField(x-1,'a') sage: OK=K.ring_of_integers() sage: 3*OK/5*OK Fractional ideal (3/5) So at least it's possible to construct a number field in Sage that is isomorphic to QQ. -- You received this message because you are su

Re: [sage-support] Sage 5.9

On Friday, May 22, 2015, Dominique Laurain wrote: > Bonjour Ines, > > Precisez SVP l'adresse du site internet que vous utilisez ? > > Est-ce que c'est bien : https://cloud.sagemath.com/ ? > > Si oui, il se peut que votre souci, soit simplement une erreur de > configuration de votre PC, ou des équ

[sage-support] (Bug?) conjugate ignored by solve()

Hi, I think I may have found a bug in Sage's solve() function: z=var('z'); solve(conjugate(z)==1+i, z) [z == (I + 1)] It sems that the conjugate is simply ignored. Obviously this leads to incorrect result for (almost) all equations involving the conjugate. Yet, solve()'s docstring simply stat

[sage-support] ideal in ring of integers: QQ vs number field

Just to bring atttention to a question at math.stackexchange: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1294942/mathbbq-isnt-a-number-field-for-sage -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving