On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Pierre wrote:
> I agree. Surely in the code one has started with a right action (say) and
> has then decided to sometimes convert it to a left action using inverses.
>
> However, some consistency would be good :-) After all, various pieces of
> code seem to disagr
> Interesting, its supposed to be possible to just install the commandline
> tools without xcode but apparently Apple broke that.
>
That would be truly annoying for them to revert to that behavior.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" g
I agree. Surely in the code one has started with a right action (say) and
has then decided to sometimes convert it to a left action using inverses.
However, some consistency would be good :-) After all, various pieces of
code seem to disagree on what U is...
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 3:32:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Pierre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just realized this, and thought it would be helpful to know for
> anyone playing with Sage's Rubik's cube abilitites. Here it is:
>
> While the following 3 commands:
>
> sage: CubeGroup().move("U")
>
> and
>
> sage: CubeGroup().plot3d
I have just realized that CubeGroup().faces("U") also goes counterclockwise
! what a mess !
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 1:07:12 PM UTC+1, Pierre wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just realized this, and thought it would be helpful to know for
> anyone playing with Sage's Rubik's cube abilitites. H
Hi,
I have just realized this, and thought it would be helpful to know for
anyone playing with Sage's Rubik's cube abilitites. Here it is:
While the following 3 commands:
sage: CubeGroup().move("U")
and
sage: CubeGroup().plot3d_cube("U")
and
sage: RubiksCube().move("U").show3d()
all take t
